2023
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202200760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological Behavior of SINTER30 Steel Subjected to Duplex Treatment

Abstract: Plasma nitriding has been extensively used to improve materials’ surface and mechanical properties using conventional plasma techniques. However, this process generally results in a nonuniformity of the properties. In the cathodic cage plasma nitriding (CCPN), the plasma is active only on the surface of the cathodic cage, eliminating inherent defects of conventional plasma nitriding. Herein, a duplex treatment, CCPN and TiN deposition, is used on SINTER30 tool steel for the first time. Vickers microhardness te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When analyzing the microhardness result, as illustrated in Figure 3 , it is verified that all samples have a surface hardness bigger than the sample of AISI 6160 steel that did not undergo treatment; this was already expected, both for what was discussed in the diffraction results’ X‐rays, as indicated in the literature. [ 4,15,26,27,29,40 ] The presence of phases such as FeN, Fe 2 N, CrN, and expanded austenite promotes an increase in surface hardness in metallic materials, specifically ferrous alloys that undergo a nitriding process. [ 1–3,29,38,47,56–60 ] Considering the deviation in the samples, it is possible to verify that they all had, on average, a very similar surface hardness value, and the more significant variation in the samples that underwent nitriding at 500 °C is due to the precipitation of nitrides and the inhomogeneity of these precipitates on the surface of the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When analyzing the microhardness result, as illustrated in Figure 3 , it is verified that all samples have a surface hardness bigger than the sample of AISI 6160 steel that did not undergo treatment; this was already expected, both for what was discussed in the diffraction results’ X‐rays, as indicated in the literature. [ 4,15,26,27,29,40 ] The presence of phases such as FeN, Fe 2 N, CrN, and expanded austenite promotes an increase in surface hardness in metallic materials, specifically ferrous alloys that undergo a nitriding process. [ 1–3,29,38,47,56–60 ] Considering the deviation in the samples, it is possible to verify that they all had, on average, a very similar surface hardness value, and the more significant variation in the samples that underwent nitriding at 500 °C is due to the precipitation of nitrides and the inhomogeneity of these precipitates on the surface of the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have been studying the performance of duplex treatment as a way to optimize the properties of films deposited on materials; [ 1,4,23,27–38 ] in general, these researchers seek to increase the diffusion of the deposited species, as well as the formation of secondary nitrides, oxides, or carbonitrides, formed from the interaction of the gas species in the second treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the low occurrence of direct ion bombardment on the sample surface allows for more intense sputtering of the cage material. As a result, it was insufficient to form the VN 2 phase and the diffusion zone beneath the layer, resulting in a film with the soft Fe 3 N phase in its microstructure 51 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%