2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribological and corrosion testing of surface engineered surgical grade CoCrMo alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technological properties and tribological conditions heavily influence the wear mechanism of the articulation components of a friction couple (Pawlus, ; Ortega‐Saenz et al ., ). Generated wear debris, which subsequently accumulates in the joint space, contribute to the limited wear resistance of a friction pair and complications developed after hip joint replacement, like third‐body damage to the articulation, inflammation of the hip joint, or audible squeaking of this joint (Hall et al ., ; Wall, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Technological properties and tribological conditions heavily influence the wear mechanism of the articulation components of a friction couple (Pawlus, ; Ortega‐Saenz et al ., ). Generated wear debris, which subsequently accumulates in the joint space, contribute to the limited wear resistance of a friction pair and complications developed after hip joint replacement, like third‐body damage to the articulation, inflammation of the hip joint, or audible squeaking of this joint (Hall et al ., ; Wall, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the microstructure of hot forged Co-Cr-Mo was found to be finer and exhibited superior mechanical properties compared to annealed alloys (Okazaki, 2008). Some reports are available on tribo-corrosion behavior of Co-Cr-Mo alloys (Ortega-Saenz et al, 2011;Pourzal et al, 2011;Mischler and Munoz, 2013). From these earlier studies, it is clear that no reported literature is available on the influence of heat treatment on microstructure, tribological, and corrosion properties of laser processed Co-Cr-Mo alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seating mechanics test measured seating displacement, seating stiffness, and seating energy calculated using the load–displacement plots. There was no significant difference in the seating displacement measured across the three material combinations studied here, which can be explained by the similarity in modulus of 316L stainless steel to CoCrMo alloy, which were the liner materials, as well as the coefficient of friction between Ti–6Al–4V and these alloys . The displacement measured at each DVRT in a single test was found to be non‐uniform, which was the case with most of the constructs, with both Stage I and II seating tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…After ICFC testing, the pushout load was found to be between 30 and 43% of the maximum load applied, that is, 4,000 N, significantly higher than the immediately post‐seated pushout results. The three material combinations did not experience significantly different pushout loads ( p > 0.05) implying that the material combination did not influence engagement strength at the acetabular taper, which can again be attributed to the similar moduli and friction of the liner materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%