2001
DOI: 10.1080/02726350109709745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triboelectric Charge Characteristics and Donor-Acceptor, Acid-Base Properties of Minerals—are They Related?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples for the influence of some individual factors on the triboelectric charging of the particles can be found in [28,[47][48][49][50][51][52][57][58][59]. The impact of factors, such as contact Table 1 List of factors taking into account during the triboelectrostatic separation (partially after [62])…”
Section: Influencing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Examples for the influence of some individual factors on the triboelectric charging of the particles can be found in [28,[47][48][49][50][51][52][57][58][59]. The impact of factors, such as contact Table 1 List of factors taking into account during the triboelectrostatic separation (partially after [62])…”
Section: Influencing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk properties determine the electronic structure and charge exchange properties: Chemical composition [29,49,57] Crystallographic structure [21] Orientation of the terminal crystallographic planes [144,145] Impurities and dopants [144] Value of work function [21] Resistivity/conductivity [58] Difference in mechanical properties [146] Surface properties which influence the charge transport and type of contact: Electric properties (surface conductivity/resistivity, effective work function, surface states, electric permittivity) [29,57,58,72] Surface roughness [99] Orientation of the planes [144] Surface termination [21] Impurities and dopants [21,60] Surface functionalization and contamination (adsorbed ions and atoms, presence of water layer on the surface, chemical conditioning) [54,55,73] New cleavage charged surfaces [147] Differences in properties which influence the type of contact and contact stress: Composition of the powder (ratio between different minerals) [58] Average particle size and size distribution [58,59,72] Difference in shapes of particles [58] Polycrystallinity Multiple faceted materials…”
Section: Insulators Characteristics Powder Characteristics Equipment mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is partly explained by the fact that the surface to volume ratio is increased when the particle diameter is decreased. Due to the measurement technique, the obtained q/m value specifies only a mean charge value for the particle sample under consideration, thus, single particle charges can differ widely due to different microscopic charging processes (Charlson et al 1992;Diaz 1997;Manouchehri et al 2001).…”
Section: Micro Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of MCC, relative to various pharmaceutical applications, are known to depend on charge characteristics of the dry powders (Ramirez-Dorronsoro et al 2006). Because triboelectric charge bears a complicated relationship to the colloidal charge of particles in aqueous suspension (Baur et al 1999;Manouchehri et al 2001), it would make sense for future research to focus more attention on the electrokinetic properties of pharmaceutical-grade MCC.…”
Section: Microcrystalline Cellulose and Pharmaceutical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%