1938
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1938.40.3.02a00040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribal Distribution in Eastern Oregon and Adjacent Regions

Abstract: TRIBAL DISTRIBUTION I N OREGON 385 to these questions permits filling some of the gaps and correcting some of the uncertainties.6 DISTRIBUTION AT T H E MIDDLE OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY The Umatilla (yumati'la, from name of principal village, i'mattlam, "lots of rocks") occupied both banks of the Columbia River from the vicinity of Rock Creek (Washington) to a point a few miles below the mouth of the Walla Walla River. North of the Columbia the territory extended to the Horse Heaven Hills, southern boundary of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong but probably unprovable impression arises on handling the artifacts that much of the material in our collection is not as recent as that which one would find on the surface of most Columbia Plateau sites, especially those to the north along the Columbia River and its larger tributaries. This apparent age would jibe well with a lack of ethnological reference and would, in turn, support the thesis of Ray, et al (1938) that the Paiute were more often than not raided and harried by the Sahaptins. This is, of course, in opposition to Berreman's (1937) suggestions that the Paiute were not only encroaching upon Sahaptin holdings along the Columbia but were in'a fair way to expel the latter from the south bank of that river.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A strong but probably unprovable impression arises on handling the artifacts that much of the material in our collection is not as recent as that which one would find on the surface of most Columbia Plateau sites, especially those to the north along the Columbia River and its larger tributaries. This apparent age would jibe well with a lack of ethnological reference and would, in turn, support the thesis of Ray, et al (1938) that the Paiute were more often than not raided and harried by the Sahaptins. This is, of course, in opposition to Berreman's (1937) suggestions that the Paiute were not only encroaching upon Sahaptin holdings along the Columbia but were in'a fair way to expel the latter from the south bank of that river.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…17 The Western Shoshoni were of great contemporary anthropological interest and importance (Thomas, Pendleton, and Cappannari 1986). Harris's publications on the White Knives, emphasising subsistence strategies in a harsh environment, betray his materialist perspective (Harris 1938(Harris , 1940a. "Acculturation here", he wrote to his Columbia mentor Ruth Benedict, "is most unexciting", but he gathered data for Linton's project nonetheless.…”
Section: Making Of the Anthropologistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fieldwork by anthropologists did not occur until mid-nineteenth century on. Principal sources include Gibbs (1877), Hale (1968), Boas (1893Boas ( , 1894Boas ( , 1901Boas ( , 1911, Sapir (1907Sapir ( , 1909, Spier and Sapir (1930), Jacobs (1936Jacobs ( , 1958Jacobs ( , 1959Jacobs ( , 1960, Ray (1937Ray ( , 1938, and so forth. Later sununary work by ethnologists include Lewis (1906) and Hodge (1907).…”
Section: Historical Sources and Their Contexts 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In almost all of these cases, the work was carried out near the end of the decline of the groups or well after they had been incorporated into reservations. The focus was, as Ray (1938) aptly stated, on "ethnographic notes" or linguistic texts and their analysis rather than on full documentation of flourishing groups.…”
Section: Historical Sources and Their Contexts 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation