2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tribal communities and coal in Northeast India: The politics of imposing and resisting mining bans

Abstract: Tribal communities initiate and manage coal mining in Nagaland and Meghalaya. Laws banning coal extraction have been challenged and resisted by local communities. The right to extract coal is tied to protecting tribal land rights. Tribal autonomy in coal policy is progressive, yet enables capture by local elites. Where there has been regulation of coal mining it has come from unexpected sources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ban on rat-hole mining triggered fundamental debates on livelihoods and indigenous rights ( McDuie-Ra and Kikon, 2016 ). The practice of rat-hole mining enabled people to make a living from coal with very low capital requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ban on rat-hole mining triggered fundamental debates on livelihoods and indigenous rights ( McDuie-Ra and Kikon, 2016 ). The practice of rat-hole mining enabled people to make a living from coal with very low capital requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicts centred around the environmental and health effects produced by fossil fuels represent another important political devaluation force, which has produced devaluation not only through sabotage, such as occupations that shut down investments (Brock and Dunlap 2018), but also through litigation that forces the premature closure of operations (McDuie‐Ra and Kikon 2016), and environmental regulations that make them more expensive (Linn and McCormack 2019). Strong environmental regulations have great potential to produce a general rather than individual devaluation in subjected countries or regions.…”
Section: Devaluation Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, various structures of the state did not become dominant in the field. Unlike petroleum in neighboring areas of Assam, coal reserves of Meghalaya remained largely under the control of indigenous institutions of governance (McDuie-Ra & Kikon, 2016). Because of these structural characteristics in this first settlement, coalmining remained as a microscale livelihood activity undertaken by indigenous people and governed mostly by tribal institutions.…”
Section: Governance Settlements In the Coalmining Sector Of Meghalayamentioning
confidence: 99%