2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.71.054314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triaxiality and the determination of the cubic shape parameterK3from five observables

Abstract: The absolute and the relative quadrupole shape invariants q 3 and K 3 provide a model independent measure of triaxiality for β-rigid nuclei. We will show that one can obtain q 3 and K 3 from a small number of observables. The approximations which are made will be shown to hold within a few percent both in the rigid triaxial rotor model and the interacting boson model. The shape parameter K 3 is given for an exemplary set of nuclei and is translated into effective values of the geometrical deformation parameter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the shell model yields large triaxiality for both isotopes, and fluctuations in K 3 are an order of magnitude larger in 88 Ge than in 86 Ge. We note that different cutoffs in the sums for deriving the shape invariants give consistent results, similar to previous works [62,63].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, the shell model yields large triaxiality for both isotopes, and fluctuations in K 3 are an order of magnitude larger in 88 Ge than in 86 Ge. We note that different cutoffs in the sums for deriving the shape invariants give consistent results, similar to previous works [62,63].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…2, are "axially symmetric" and have γ ≈ 0. (Recent empirical estimates of the effective γ deformation of transitional and deformed rare-earth nuclei [32] yield comparably large dynamical γ softness. )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is clear that the commutation relations defined in the IBM given in (22) are the same as those shown in (11) defined in the SU(3) shell model. Then the exact IBM image of a rigid triaxial rotor Hamiltonian should be given as the same functional form as that shown in (17) but with {L s ,Q s } replaced by {L b ,Q b }.…”
Section: The Ibm Image Of a Rigid Triaxial Rotormentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These are the spherical vibration in the U(5) limit, the axially symmetric rotation in the SU(3) limit, and the γ -unstable motion in the O(6) limit. Traditionally, the O(6) limit is often considered as the finite-N behavior of the (γ -soft) triaxiality in the IBM if up to two-body interactions are included in the Hamiltonian [21,22]. Since a rigid rotor Hamiltonian can be exactly mapped into the SU(3) shell model under the SU(3) ⊃ SO(3) integrity basis, the same mapping given in (17) can also be realized in the SU(3) limit of the IBM.…”
Section: The Ibm Image Of a Rigid Triaxial Rotormentioning
confidence: 99%