2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02357-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triaxial Compression Testing at Constant and Reducing Confining Pressure for the Mechanical Characterization of a Specific Type of Sandstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fracture angle was predicted to stabilize at approximately 45 • . The fracture morphology and orientation of the rock specimen exhibited the same strong graduality and continuity with confining pressure as the experimental results [46][47][48], which cannot be achieved by the conventional damage model [45].…”
Section: Fracture Modessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The fracture angle was predicted to stabilize at approximately 45 • . The fracture morphology and orientation of the rock specimen exhibited the same strong graduality and continuity with confining pressure as the experimental results [46][47][48], which cannot be achieved by the conventional damage model [45].…”
Section: Fracture Modessupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Moreover, the higher the confining pressure, the more obvious the observed ductility characteristics are. Peisen Zhang [24] et al conducted seepage tests on sandstone with different confining pressure and cyclic load and confirmed the five evolution stages of sandstone, including the primary microfracture compression closure stage, the elastic compression stage, the crack stability development stage, the crack rapid development stage, and the post-peak deformation failure stage. The authors pointed out that rock cracking stress and damage stress are important indicators for determining the rock failure process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The crack initiation stress ( ci ) identified by these two methods shows great consistency. After that, the unstable crack growth stress was reached (which is named the crack damage stress, cd ), and at this point the volumetric strain started to reverse (from compassion to dilation) (Vásárhelyi and Bobet 2000;Zhang et al 2021b). This stage was noted as the crack damage stage, which was characterised by a drop in ultrasonic wave velocity, intensified plastic deformation, the boost of AE events, and damage initiation (will be discussed in Sects.…”
Section: Stress-strain Curves and Yielding Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of hydrostatic pressure is normally ignored in the associated plastic flow, for example, as model assumptions in the von Mises yield criterion. Recent research shows that the associated plastic flow rule can roughly estimate the plasticity of rock specimens (Zhang et al 2021a). However, as a typical frictional material, the plastic behaviour of rock is related to the slip of microcracks (shear failures), where the increment of plastic strain generally does not coincide with the gradient of plastic yield function (Lockner et al 1992;Li et al 2017;Oh et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%