2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2011.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triassic metamorphism in the northern part of the Tahamí Terrane of the central cordillera of Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
47
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The Central Cordillera has an extensive Mesozoic-Cenozoic magmatic record characterized by a series of plutonic bodies considered to be Late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous in age (Aspden et al, 1987;Villagómez et al, 2011). These rocks intrude the Permian-Triassic and older metamorphic basement (Vinasco et al, 2006;Restrepo et al, 2011;Villagómez et al, 2011;Martens et al, 2014). The Mesozoic magmatic record is related to a volcanic arc formed by the subduction of the Farallon plate beneath the NW margin of South America (Aspden et al, 1987;Villagómez et al, 2011;Cochrane et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Central Cordillera has an extensive Mesozoic-Cenozoic magmatic record characterized by a series of plutonic bodies considered to be Late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous in age (Aspden et al, 1987;Villagómez et al, 2011). These rocks intrude the Permian-Triassic and older metamorphic basement (Vinasco et al, 2006;Restrepo et al, 2011;Villagómez et al, 2011;Martens et al, 2014). The Mesozoic magmatic record is related to a volcanic arc formed by the subduction of the Farallon plate beneath the NW margin of South America (Aspden et al, 1987;Villagómez et al, 2011;Cochrane et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Permian-Triassic, the Central Cordillera and the Cordillera Real of Colombia and Ecuador experienced the last phases of the agglomeration of Pangea and the beginning of its breakup, which is reflected in bimodal S-type and gabbroic syntectonic magmatism (Vinasco et al, 2006;Restrepo et al, 2011;Cochrane et al, 2014b;Martens et al, 2014). Following this event, there was an apparent magmatic and tectonic quiescence, reflected in the formation of significant carbonate platforms until the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic (Cediel et al, 2003;Ramos, 2009), until subduction resumed in the Early Jurassic (Ramos, 2009;Vásquez et al, 2010).…”
Section: Jurassic Tectonomagmatic Evolution Of the Northern Andesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14; Table 1). Permian to Middle Triassic igneous and metamorphic rocks are widespread in the Central Cordillera of Colombia and the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta (e.g Vinasco et al, 2006;Montes et al, 2010;Restrepo et al, 2011;Villagómez et al, 2011;Spikings et al, 2014)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering also interaction with Central America blocks during the Triassic, some authors propose terrane accretion or strong plate coupling implying large migration from the south of the Arquia and Tahami Terranes (e.g., Cardona et al, ; Kennan & Pindell, ). Also, recent geochronological studies have hypothesized a Triassic Andean‐type orogeny on the western side of Pangea, as part of an orogenic belt that affected rocks presently in the NW SA (Restrepo et al, ). Similarly, paleogeographic models for Pangea, considering a strong paleomagnetic data input, suggest a subduction zone along a relatively continuous and regular western margin of Pangea during middle‐late Triassic (Golonka & Ford, ; Scotese, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Arquia Terrane and the Quebradagrande Terrane make up the Romeral Suture, which lies sandwiched between the continental Tahami Terrane and the accreted oceanic Caribe Terrane (Figure ; Gómez et al, ). Over the past decade, geochronological and geochemical works focusing on the genesis and tectonic affinity of the terranes affected by Triassic magmatism have been performed (e.g., González, ; Martens et al, ; Nivia et al, ; Restrepo et al, ; Spikings et al, ; Vinasco et al, ; Villagómez et al, ); however, conclusions of these studies contain contradicting interpretations about the tectonic framework during the Triassic in NW SA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%