2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-008-0283-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triangulated spherical splines for geopotential reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory and computation of bivariate splines become matured and has had continued growth; see the monograph by Lai and Schumaker (2007) for basic theories of bivariate, trivariate, and spherical splines, and see Awanou, Lai, and Wenston (2006) and Baramidze, Lai, and Shum (2006) for some numerical implementations of multivariate splines for data fitting and their application to geopotential reconstruction in Lai et al (2009). We refer to Lai (2008) for a survey of multivariate splines for scattered data fitting and some numerical examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory and computation of bivariate splines become matured and has had continued growth; see the monograph by Lai and Schumaker (2007) for basic theories of bivariate, trivariate, and spherical splines, and see Awanou, Lai, and Wenston (2006) and Baramidze, Lai, and Shum (2006) for some numerical implementations of multivariate splines for data fitting and their application to geopotential reconstruction in Lai et al (2009). We refer to Lai (2008) for a survey of multivariate splines for scattered data fitting and some numerical examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distinguishes the Slepian functions philosophically from the eigenfunctions of full-phase-space localization operators (Daubechies 1988;Simons et al 2003) or wavelets (Daubechies and Paul 1988;Olhede and Walden 2002), with which they nevertheless share strong connections (Lilly and Park 1995;Shepp and Zhang 2000;Shen 2004, 2005). Strict localization of this type remained the driving force behind the development of Slepian functions over fixed geographical domains on the surface of the sphere (Albertella et al 1999;Miranian 2004;) -which have numerous applications in geodesy (Albertella and Sacerdote 2001;Han et al 2008a;, geomagnetism (Simons et al 2009;Schott and Th茅bault 2011), geophysics (Han and Ditmar 2007;Han et al 2008b;Han and Simons 2008;Harig et al 2010), biomedical (Maniar and Mitra 2005;Mitra and Maniar 2006) and planetary (Evans et al 2010;Han 2008;Han et al 2009;Wieczorek and Simons 2005) science, and cosmology (Dahlen and Simons 2008;Wieczorek and Simons 2007) -as opposed to approaches using spherical wavelets (Chambodut et al 2005;Fa每 et al 2008;Fengler et al 2007;Freeden and Windheuser 1997;Holschneider et al 2003;Kido et al 2003;McEwen et al 2007;Panet et al 2006;Schmidt et al 2006), needlets (Marinucci et al 2008), splines (Amirbekyan et al 2008;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the methods proposed by Lindgren et al (2011) and by Niu et al (2019) can deal with more general forms of non-planar domains. Regularised least-square smoothing methods able to fit data scattered on spheres include Wahba (1981), Baramidze et al (2006), & Lai et al (2009), while Duchamp & Stuetzle (2003) and SR-PDE (Ettinger et al, 2016;Lila et al, 2016; work on general non-planar domains. Finally, other smoothing methods over general nonplanar domains include nearest-neighborhood techniques (see, e.g., Hagler et al, 2006) and heat-kernel smoothing (see, e.g., Chung et al, 2005Chung et al, , 2017, and references therein).…”
Section: Data Over Complex Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%