2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triangular and quadrilateral surface mesh quality optimization using local parametrization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the special case with μ A = 0 would reduce to the most isometric parameterization (MIPS) of Hormann and Griener [18] and is closely related to the condition-number-based optimization in [7]. The direct minimization of E I may seem difficult because of the presence of κ 2 (A).…”
Section: Mesh Optimization and Isometric Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the special case with μ A = 0 would reduce to the most isometric parameterization (MIPS) of Hormann and Griener [18] and is closely related to the condition-number-based optimization in [7]. The direct minimization of E I may seem difficult because of the presence of κ 2 (A).…”
Section: Mesh Optimization and Isometric Mappingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is the angle-based method of Zhou and Shimada [11]. Another notable example is the method of Garimella et al [7], which minimizes the condition numbers of the Jacobian of the triangles against some reference Jacobian matrices (RJM). More recently, the finite-element-based method is used in [8], but their method is relatively difficult to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, local formulations tend to be easier to implement and require less computer memory. For linear elements, several local [46,47,48] and global [49,50,51,52,53,54,55] approaches have been proposed to improve the mesh quality. For high-order meshes, similar local [32] and global relocation methods [31,33,34,35] have also been developed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach commonly used to constrain nodes to the underlying smooth surface is to reposition each vertex in a locally derived tangent plane and then to pull the vertex back to the smooth surface [1,5]. Another one is to reposition them in a 2D parameterization of the surface and then to map them back to the physical space [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%