2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triangle zones – Geometry, kinematics, mechanics, and the need for appreciation of uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Ma and 12 Ma (von Hagke et al, 2014;Kempf et al, 1999;Ortner et al, 2015). Despite the uncertainty in the shortening estimates within the Subalpine Molasse (Burkhard and Sommaruga, 1998;von Hagke and Malz, 2018;Ortner et al, 2015), we observe that late Miocene cumulative shortening of the Subalpine Molasse and the Jura FTB decreases constantly from the west to the east from >30 km near Geneva to 20 km near Lake Constance, before finally decreasing to <1 km near Salzburg (12.8° E; Fig. 5b).…”
Section: Late Miocene Shortening Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…20 Ma and 12 Ma (von Hagke et al, 2014;Kempf et al, 1999;Ortner et al, 2015). Despite the uncertainty in the shortening estimates within the Subalpine Molasse (Burkhard and Sommaruga, 1998;von Hagke and Malz, 2018;Ortner et al, 2015), we observe that late Miocene cumulative shortening of the Subalpine Molasse and the Jura FTB decreases constantly from the west to the east from >30 km near Geneva to 20 km near Lake Constance, before finally decreasing to <1 km near Salzburg (12.8° E; Fig. 5b).…”
Section: Late Miocene Shortening Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The signal of a decreasing amount of horizontal shortening seems to be robust, despite the admittedly large uncertainties with respect to estimates in the Subalpine Molasse (see e.g. Burkhard and Sommaruga, 1998;von Hagke and Malz, 2018;Ortner et al, 2015). As stated below (see next comment), there is no evidence for late Miocene shortening further east than ca 12.8 • E as shown by the studies of Hinsch (2013) and Beidinger and Decker (2014).…”
Section: Interactive Commentmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…They also differ from triangle zones that are formed above a single detachment (i.e., the type I triangle zone; Fig. 1A), which are simpler structures that can only accommodate very limited shortening (von Hagke and Malz, 2018). In contrast, the type 1 triangle zone in fold 3 shown here likely overlies deeper structures above the basal detachment (Figs.…”
Section: Implications For Triangle Zone Structuresmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Triangle zones are "structures with a triangular shape in section view accommodating shortening by coeval activity of a basal thrust and an associated backthrust of opposite vergence (e.g., Fig. 1; von Hagke and Malz, 2018). This study provides new details of triangle zone and wedge thrust structures within a submarine fold belt formed across multiple detachments within overpressured shales, especially in the third dimension (i.e., along strike).…”
Section: Implications For Triangle Zone Structuresmentioning
confidence: 84%