Triangle of Justice

Kowarsch, Martin; Gösele, Andreas

doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4540-7_7

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to asking questions about who should pay for such assistance, justice approaches have sought to articulate a basis for defining a set of rights or principles against which the harms of climate change might be judged. The framework of human rights provides one common entry point (Caney, 2010b;Kowarsch and Gösele, 2012). Another well-developed perspective is the 'capabilities approach', which seeks to identify, so as to safeguard, ''the range of capacities necessary for people to develop free and productive lives they design for themselves'' (Schlosberg, 2012: 452).…”

Section: Climate Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

A social justice framing of climate change discourse and policy: Adaptation, resilience and vulnerability in a Jamaican agricultural landscape

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Climate Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

A social justice framing of climate change discourse and policy: Adaptation, resilience and vulnerability in a Jamaican agricultural landscape

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…how the burdens (and costs) of the global transition are allocated among states that are, to varying degrees, affected by climate change, and have varying capacities to carry out the transition. 62 This takes us to such questions regarding how NDCs should be calculated, considering also historical responsibility for emissions, 63 and what specific role should the concept of just transition play here. In our view, just transition could also guide in determining NDCs, if it worked as an umbrella or framing concept of climate action.…”

Section: Vertical Perspective On Just Transitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building the Concept of Just Transition in Law: Reflections on its Conceptual Framing, Structure and Content

Müllerová,

Balounová,

Ruppel

et al. 2023

EPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article focuses on the concept of just transition, which has recently greatly expanded in the climate debate, expressing the demand to adopt and implement climate policies leading to decarbonisation in a way that maintains equity and justice. Building on previous research on the concept of just transition in other disciplines of social sciences, and on the concept’s appearance in international climate law instruments and law literature, we analyse the just transition in the field of law. We seek to clarify its conceptual framing, to define its meaning, and to determine its position and limits in law. We then examine it vertically (for each level of law) and horizontally, addressing the main criteria that define its content, i.e., human rights and legal principles.

show abstract

“…Based on the ethical discussions in the literature (e.g., Kowarsch and Gösele 2012, or Armstrong 2006and Groenfeldt 2013 for a more specific discussion on water ethics), modelers could include a broader range of normative assumptions and explore their practical consequences. However, there is a trade-off in covering a wider range of issues on the one hand, and accounting for their increasing complexity (possibly leading to more errors in the model results), low transparency and the difficulty of understanding them on the other hand..…”

Section: An Outlook On Possible Model Enhancementsmentioning

confidence: 99%