2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trial-level information for individual faces in the fusiform face area depends on subsequent memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, an early article establishing the role of LOC in visual processing of objects found that greater activation of this region during encoding of objects was associated with greater subsequent memory (Grill-Spector et al, 2000). Since that time, multiple studies have also shown that activation in these category-preferential regions is linked to individual differences in long-term memory performance (Hasinski & Sederberg, 2016; Kim, 2011; Bernstein, Beig, Siegenthaler, & Grady, 2002). Similarly, recent work in children and adults found that increased activation of the parahippocampal cortex for the encoding of complex visual scenes was associated with greater subsequent memory for those scenes (Chai et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, an early article establishing the role of LOC in visual processing of objects found that greater activation of this region during encoding of objects was associated with greater subsequent memory (Grill-Spector et al, 2000). Since that time, multiple studies have also shown that activation in these category-preferential regions is linked to individual differences in long-term memory performance (Hasinski & Sederberg, 2016; Kim, 2011; Bernstein, Beig, Siegenthaler, & Grady, 2002). Similarly, recent work in children and adults found that increased activation of the parahippocampal cortex for the encoding of complex visual scenes was associated with greater subsequent memory for those scenes (Chai et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although associative memory formation and the neural mechanisms that support associative memory have been studied across development (DeMaster, Pathman, Lee, & Ghetti, 2014; DeMaster, Pathman, & Ghetti, 2013; Paz-Alonso, Bunge, Anderson, & Ghetti, 2013; Ghetti, DeMaster, Yonelinas, & Bunge, 2010), scant research has investigated the role of visual association cortex in the development of visual associative memory. Recent evidence shows that recruitment of visual association cortex during encoding is associated with memory performance (Hasinski & Sederberg, 2016; Wendelken, Baym, Gazzaley, & Bunge, 2011; Chai, Ofen, Jacobs, & Gabrieli, 2010; Xue et al, 2010; Grill-Spector, Kushnir, Hendler, & Malach, 2000), suggesting that secondary sensory areas may facilitate memory encoding by maintaining attention to the representation of the to-be-remembered stimulus. This study investigates neurodevelopmental changes in associative memory for faces and objects to determine whether visual processing regions that respond preferentially to particular stimuli (e.g., faces or objects) support developmental and individual differences in associative memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The encoding variability hypothesis predicts that better memory is achieved when the representations were more dissimilar across repetitions, and that spacing the repetitions enhances memory by further increasing the dissimilarity. Contrary to these predictions, however, studies using fMRI and representational similarity analysis have found that greater similarity rather than dissimilarity in neural representations across repetitions was associated with better subsequent memory (Xue et al, 2010;Ward et al, 2013;Hasinski and Sederberg, 2016;Zheng et al, 2018). Other studies have further demonstrated that reactivations of prior representations during subsequent learning contribute to successful memory encoding (Kuhl et al, 2010;Lu et al, 2015;Koen and Rugg, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…At a functional level, this back projection likely amplifies neural signalling elicited by a specific face and enhances processing of the facial percept. This may manifest in a number of ways, including increased attention and greater recall (Baldauf & Desimone, ; Hasinski & Sederberg, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%