Trial fairness before impact: Tracing the link between post-conflict trials and peace stability

Steinert, Christoph

doi:10.1080/03050629.2019.1657114

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The remaining 289 individuals (69.6%) did not react to the survey invitation. A detailed discussion of the survey and its substantive results can be found in (Steinert 2019).…”

Section: Survey Administrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who are Our Experts? Predictors of Participation in Expert Surveys

Steinert

Ruggeri

2020

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Who are the colleagues participating when asked to complete expert surveys? This research note investigates which individuals’ characteristics associate with positive responses. Drawing on an expert survey dedicated to post-conflict trials, we collect data on various attributes of both respondents and non-respondents such as their age, sex, academic positions, disciplines, and research outputs. We expect that decisions to participate result from an interplay of (1) individuals’ levels of context-specific expertise, (2) the value attached to their expert role, (3) their confidence in making authoritative statements, and (4) resource constraints. Employing logistic regression models and statistical simulations (n = 414), we find that context-specific expertise is the primary, but not the only determinant of participation. On the one hand and luckily, individuals whose research corresponds closely to the object of study are most likely to participate. On the other hand and unfortunately, individuals with high citation outputs, female experts, and Area Studies-scholars are less likely to respond. Consequently, certain groups are under-represented in expert evaluations frequently considered as authoritative source of knowledge.

show abstract

“…The remaining 289 individuals (69.6%) did not react to the survey invitation. A detailed discussion of the survey and its substantive results can be found in (Steinert 2019).…”

Section: Survey Administrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who are Our Experts? Predictors of Participation in Expert Surveys

Steinert

Ruggeri

2020

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Peace Agreements

Quinn¹,

Álvarez²

2020

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Types and Prevalence In contemporary usage, the term peace agreement loosely describes any textual instrument produced in a process aimed at ending or preventing armed conflict between two or more parties. Such a typology stretches from protocols, principles, frameworks, and memorandums at one end, toward single and limited issue agreements and comprehensive accords at the other. Here the most common types of peace agreements are presented by surveying the most widely used datasets and research projects on peace agreements. The Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) Peace Agreement Dataset at the University of Uppsala (Sweden) contains 217 peace agreements of various types signed between 1975 and 2011 (UCDP 2020). Of these 217 peace agreements, all but 20 were signed in

show abstract

Peace Agreements

Quinn¹,

Álvarez²

2020

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trial fairness before impact: Tracing the link between post-conflict trials and peace stability

Cited by 4 publications

References 59 publications

Who are Our Experts? Predictors of Participation in Expert Surveys

Who are Our Experts? Predictors of Participation in Expert Surveys

Peace Agreements

Peace Agreements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About