1983
DOI: 10.3366/gas.1983.10.10.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trial excavations on Pictish and Viking settlements at Saevar Howe, Birsay, Orkney

Abstract: SUMMARY This mound was excavated by James Farrer in 1862 and 1867 and, although many finds were recovered, the primitive methods employed did not allow a satisfactory interpretation of the site to be formed. A long cist cemetery was discovered, and an iron bell recovered from it. Fresh excavations took place in 1977 and, although not completed, showed, with the help of stratigraphy and radiocarbon dates, that a Viking settlement overlay a Pictish one. The cemetery found in the 19th century is assigned to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total amount of sediment excavated will clearly affect the fish NISP and there are insufficient data available to stand-ardize the measure by unit volume. Large-and small-scale excavations are represented in both periods (Hedges 1983;Morris 1989;Pollard 1992; Hunter e f a]. B.B.…”
Section: Zooarchaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total amount of sediment excavated will clearly affect the fish NISP and there are insufficient data available to stand-ardize the measure by unit volume. Large-and small-scale excavations are represented in both periods (Hedges 1983;Morris 1989;Pollard 1992; Hunter e f a]. B.B.…”
Section: Zooarchaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Crosskirk, the seated burial is associated with the main period of occupation of the broch, while the two other cists appear to post-date this main phase of use (Fairhurst 1984, 101-3). These, along with more well-known complexes at Buckquoy and Saevar Howe in Orkney (Ritchie 1977;Hedges 1983), suggests that the transformation of settlement sites into burial places, and apparently vice versa, was a feature of the later first millennium A.D. in Caithness as elsewhere.…”
Section: Lambsdale Leans As a Burial Sitementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Here limpets were the most commonly gathered types, followed by periwinkle, but the contexts were such that it was difficult to tell if the shellfish was for human consumption or for bait (Rackham 1989: 260). Thick deposits of limpet and whelk shells were also found during 19th-and 20th-century excavations at Saevar Howe, with settlement here dating to both the Pictish and Viking period (Hedges 1983). Again there was little evidence on whether the shellfish were a primary food source or were used as fish bait (Hedges 1983: 113).…”
Section: Wider Parallelsmentioning
confidence: 99%