2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000600015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triagem auditiva neonatal: ocorrência de falhas, perdas auditivas e indicadores de riscos

Abstract: To check the rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators for hearing loss in newborns submitted to the Newborn Hearing Screening in a secondary hospital. Materials and Methods:Cross-sectional and retrospective study, involving 1,570 newborns submitted to the different stages of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Initially, we carried out otoacoustic emission tests (ILO Echocheck) and the cochlear-eyelid reflex. Afterwards, we analyzed the demographic and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
15
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent to those found in longitudinal studies that show rates of 46% evasion. [18][19][20] After analyzing the audiological evaluation performed during follow-up, it was found that from the verbal commands. 8 In the follow-up, 41 children aged from nine months could be evaluated in relation to the ability to recognize verbal commands.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent to those found in longitudinal studies that show rates of 46% evasion. [18][19][20] After analyzing the audiological evaluation performed during follow-up, it was found that from the verbal commands. 8 In the follow-up, 41 children aged from nine months could be evaluated in relation to the ability to recognize verbal commands.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Outra pesquisa encontrou um índice de 19,1%, dado significante segundo teste estatístico Z (p=0.0001), inferindo um elevado índice de RN encaminhados para uma nova avaliação. 18 No estudo de Onada e colaboradores, 21 encontraram 1,7% de RN que falharam ao teste de triagem e que foram encaminhadas para diagnósti-co. Este valor está de acordo com o recomendado pelo Comitê Brasileiro de Perda Auditiva na Infân-cia, que sugerem que este índice não deve ultrapassar 4% dos indivíduos avaliados, 22 o que discorda do presente estudo, onde foi encontrado um ín-dice de 6,02%. Dos RN avaliados neste estudo 4 (0,10%) foram diagnosticada com perda auditiva neurossensorial unilateral e/ou bilateral.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…23 E numa população de 1570 RN, encontraram oito (0,5%) com alteração auditiva, sendo quatro deficiências auditivas neurossensorial (0,25%), uma deficiên-cia auditiva condutiva devido à malformação craniofacial (0,06%) e três crianças com suspeita de alteração retrococlear (0,2%). 21 Obtivemos um baixo índice de absenteísmo ao reteste (4,93%) totalizando 18 bebês faltosos. E para a avaliação diagnóstica, não compareceram 6 RN (27,27%), alta taxa de abandono quando comparado a outros estudos; absenteísmo a conclusão do diagnóstico de 0,93%, ou seja 6 RN 19 e (1%) 16 RN.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Neonatal Hearing Screening (TAN) Program has as purpose the early detection and rehabilitation of hearing impairment [7][8][9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%