Triagem auditiva neonatal: índice de passa/falha com relação a sexo, tipo de parto e tempo de vida

Michelon, Franciele; Rockenbach, Sheila Petry; Floriano, Marilise; Delgado, Susana; Barba, Marion Cristine de

doi:10.1590/s1516-18462013000500016

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Differently, in the CRSA the "pass" result rate was approximately 86.0%, corroborating with other studies that report data from 75.6 to 88.3% (18)(19)(20) , as well as referral for follow-up due to RIHL 0.3% and diagnosis 4.8%…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Children's Hearing Health Panorama in the Unified Health System in the state of Sergipe

Duarte,

Silva,

Carlino

et al. 2024

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To describe the panorama of children’s hearing health in the Unified Health System of the state of Sergipe. Methods A quantitative and retrospective study consisting of four steps: 1) Search the National Registry of Health Establishments of institutions affiliated to the Health Unic System in the state of Sergipe that perform obstetric services and hearing health services; 2) Collecting Neonatal Hearing Screening (NHS) coverage data through DATASUS (from 2012 to 2020); 3) Data collection from medical records of institutions with obstetrics and that perform NHS; and 4) Interview with the guardians of children undergoing auditory rehabilitation. The results were summarized using descriptive statistics (absolute and relative frequency, measures of central tendency, and dispersion). Results Only one out of the 29 establishments with obstetrics performs NHS. Two of the Hearing Health Reference Centers (HHRC) are qualified for cochlear implants and two Specialized Centers are qualified for Rehabilitation. From 2012 to 2020, NHS coverage in the state was less than 40%, and when performed in the maternity ward, there were no referrals for Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response (BERA) and audiological diagnosis. The HHRC showed considerable coverage and a lower evasion rate to perform BERA, with a diagnosis rate of 4.8%. The mean time from the NHS to rehabilitation was longer than recommended. Conclusion NHS coverage must be increased, adjusting the hearing health network to articulate the different levels of care, and reducing the time for identification, diagnosis, and start of rehabilitation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Children's Hearing Health Panorama in the Unified Health System in the state of Sergipe

Duarte,

Silva,

Carlino

et al. 2024

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the sample was homogeneous, there was a higher number of male individuals concurring with other studies 14,15 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Avaliação do programa de triagem auditiva neonatal da Clínica Escola do Univag

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Test failure rate was comparable to that reported in another study, performed in four maternities in Paraná, that found 5%, 3% and 2% in three of the institutions (data were not presented in the last) 10 , but lower than presented in studies conducted in secondary-level maternities, which found 11.7% and 25.3% 9,11 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program

Marinho¹,

Pereira²,

Torres³

et al. 2020

Rev. saúde pública

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Newborn Hearing Screening Program of Hospital Regional de Sobradinho, from January 2016 to December 2017, according to Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health parameters and Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations, as well as to describe the prevalence of risk factors for hearing loss within the study population and their impact on the respective program. METHOD: This is a quantitative, cross-sectional and retrospective study that carefully analyzed registration books of screened newborns. It was established the prevalence of “pass” and “fail” in test and retest, retest percentage of attendance and referral for audiological diagnosis. Risk factors for hearing loss were described, as well as their influence on “pass” and “fail” rates. Inferential statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and Anderson-Darling test, with 5% reliability index. RESULTS: A total of 3,981 newborns were screened; 2,963 (74.4%) presented no risk factors whereas 1,018 (25.6%) did, prematurity being the most frequent (51.6%). In the test, 166 (4.2%) failed and 118 (71.1%) attended the retest. The referral rate for diagnosis was 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Regarding the percentage of referral for diagnosis, the program reached indexes recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing and Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health. The most prevalent risk factor within the population was prematurity.

show abstract

Triagem auditiva neonatal: índice de passa/falha com relação a sexo, tipo de parto e tempo de vida

Cited by 7 publications

References 14 publications

Children's Hearing Health Panorama in the Unified Health System in the state of Sergipe

Children's Hearing Health Panorama in the Unified Health System in the state of Sergipe

Avaliação do programa de triagem auditiva neonatal da Clínica Escola do Univag

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About