2022
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triage by PAX1 and ZNF582 Methylation in Women With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3: A Multicenter Case–Control Study

Abstract: Background The colposcopy-conization inconsistency is common in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3). No adequate method has been reported to identify the final pathology of conization. In this study, we explored the ability of PAX1 and ZNF582 methylation to predict the pathological outcome of conization in advance. Methods This was a multicenter study and included 277 histologically confirmed CIN3 wom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, CDB-confirmed CIN2 and CIN3 were stratified to predict pathological progression after CKC. We found that 19.5% (23/118) of the CDB-confirmed CIN3 cases were pathologically upgraded to ESCC after CKC, which was higher than previously reported ( 15 ), indicating that CDB alone is insufficient for the diagnosis of microinvasive cervical cancer ( 21 ). In the CDB-confirmed CIN2 group, 36% of the CIN2 cases were pathologically upgraded to CIN3 and 30% regressed to LSIL and below, however, none of the CIN2 cases were pathologically upgraded to SCC after CKC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, CDB-confirmed CIN2 and CIN3 were stratified to predict pathological progression after CKC. We found that 19.5% (23/118) of the CDB-confirmed CIN3 cases were pathologically upgraded to ESCC after CKC, which was higher than previously reported ( 15 ), indicating that CDB alone is insufficient for the diagnosis of microinvasive cervical cancer ( 21 ). In the CDB-confirmed CIN2 group, 36% of the CIN2 cases were pathologically upgraded to CIN3 and 30% regressed to LSIL and below, however, none of the CIN2 cases were pathologically upgraded to SCC after CKC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…PAX1 m has also been reported to predict the efficacy of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in cervical cancer ( 13 ), and is a potential biomarker for monitoring the prognosis of cervical adenocarcinoma ( 14 ). However, few studies have evaluated PAX1 gene methylation before conization, it has been previously reported that PAX1 m would be a suitable alternative method to conventional options and it has the ability to predict the outcome of conization in CIN3 cases ( 15 ). However, the role of PAX1 m in predicting the pathological upgrade of CIN2 is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,44 No study about HPV methylation and SIR has been reported, while it's noted that LAX1 and ZNF582, the biomarkers of methylation detection, has been reported to be probably correlated with difference of transformation from cervical inflammation to carcinoma. 45,46 Applying p16/ki67 dual staining also showed prognostic value in triaging women with HPV infection associated diseases. 47,48 These findings suggested that combining various HR-HPV infection status tests and SIR biomarkers may contribute to disease surveillance and outcome prediction, and even the triage of clinical populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the cost and the limitation of detection method, it is challenging to expand the application of these predictive factors. Numerous studies highlighted that the methylation, especially PAX1 methylation, had high screening accuracy for CIN2 + , serving as a potential triage method for women with HPV infections or as a predictor of the worst pathological outcome [23,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. In this study, we also considered the assessment of PAX1 methylation levels.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%