2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triage accuracy and causes of mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale

Abstract: Purpose To identify emergency department triage accuracy using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) and evaluate the causes of mistriage. Methods This cross-sectional retrospective study was based on 1267 systematically selected records of adult patients admitted to two emergency departments between October 2016 and September 2017. Twenty-four variables were assessed, including chief complaints, vital signs according to the initial nursing records, and clinical out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This system requires immediate treatment for patients at level 1, where immediate resuscitation is required. Level 2 patients (emergency) are required to receive treatment within 15 minutes, level 3 patients (urgent) within 30 minutes, level 4 patients (less urgent) within one hour, and level 5 patients (non-urgent) within two hours [22].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system requires immediate treatment for patients at level 1, where immediate resuscitation is required. Level 2 patients (emergency) are required to receive treatment within 15 minutes, level 3 patients (urgent) within 30 minutes, level 4 patients (less urgent) within one hour, and level 5 patients (non-urgent) within two hours [22].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, even though the AUROC of the models may be acceptable in some instances, it cannot be denied that further improvements would be desirable. However, it must be noted that even between experienced triage nurses, the interrater weighted-kappa value was 0.772 [26], and 0.83 between triage nurses and experts in a retrospective review [27]. Although there is room for further improvement, even at its current state, the prediction model may be of assistance to triage personnel as an adjunct tool because expertise in triage instruments requires considerable training and may be limited in resource-constrained settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demand was clearly shown in a survey of triage nurses, where the most requested feature for a new tool being built was an automatic severity grade calculator for the emergency severity index, which is a widely used triage instrument [28]. Due to the inherent complexity and uncertainty involved with the triage of patients, misclassification, over-triage, and under-triage are always possible [27], and a rule-based decision support system for triage has been shown to reduce classification errors [29]. A support tool based on machine learning and NLP may also reduce triage errors and may be more robust to out-of-vocabulary terms than a rule-based system; this would be worth exploring in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of patient is classified as either adult or pediatric, and they are separated to get treatments in different areas. Their acuity is categorized by the triage method, and their clinical conditions are evaluated according to a symptom-oriented classification tool [32]. After triage, the patient is assigned a bed with priority given to cases of high acuity level; thus, some patients may not be assigned beds.…”
Section: Emergency Department Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%