Environmental Challenges and Greenhouse Gas Control for Fossil Fuel Utilization in the 21st Century 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0773-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tri-reforming of Natural Gas Using CO2 in Flue Gas of Power Plants without CO2 Pre-separation for Production of Synthesis Gas with Desired H2/CO Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, CO 2 can be separated, recovered, and purified from flue gases of fossil‐fuel‐based power plants by two or more steps. This is mainly based on either absorption or adsorption or membrane separation which adds significant cost to the CO 2 conversion or sequestration system. Tri‐reforming is a synergetic combination of CO 2 reforming, steam reforming, and partial oxidation of natural gas.…”
Section: Co2 Conversion To Carbonaceous Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, CO 2 can be separated, recovered, and purified from flue gases of fossil‐fuel‐based power plants by two or more steps. This is mainly based on either absorption or adsorption or membrane separation which adds significant cost to the CO 2 conversion or sequestration system. Tri‐reforming is a synergetic combination of CO 2 reforming, steam reforming, and partial oxidation of natural gas.…”
Section: Co2 Conversion To Carbonaceous Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study demonstrated a reduction in the overall CO 2 footprint by over 65%, besides a 20% reduction in operating costs. Numerous research studies have suggested using a combined reforming process (CRM) wherein DRM is combined with conventional technologies like SRM and POX to address the DRM challenges. , In another study, Baltrusaitis et al studied SRM, DRM, ATR, and reverse water gas shift reaction (RWGSR) combinations. Luyben et al explored the design trade-offs of the DRM conditions on the downstream processes while conducting a sensitivity analysis on the methane conversion, CO 2 consumption, and energy consumption in various processes within a GTL plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental and computational studies by Song et al 19 prove that the tri-reforming (TRM, a combination of SRM, POX, and DRM) process can produce a syngas ratio of 1.5−2 while eliminating the formation of soot (solid carbon) in the reactor. Similar results were seen by Kang et al, 22 where the TRM proved more favorable to produce syngas than DRM.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the existing challenges on the lab-scale conditions, e.g., (i) low gas hour space velocity (GHSV; 10–100 L g cat –1 h –1 ), (ii) low pressures (∼1 bar), (iii) dilute feed (reactants/inert gas ≥4), etc., ,,, DRM catalysts are sensitive to feedstock impurities, and a CO 2 capture and purification system is essential to avoid catalyst poisoning. The capture and purification of imported or recovered CO 2 from industrial sources require additional 2.1–5.7 MJ/kg CO 2 based on the technology employed. , More importantly, the current stats are based on the lab-scale conditions under dilute conditions. With the scale-up, these limitations can play a significant role, and the amount of CO 2 sequestered may decrease further.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capture and purification of imported or recovered CO 2 from industrial sources require additional 2.1−5.7 MJ/kg CO 2 based on the technology employed. 38,46 More importantly, the current stats are based on the lab-scale conditions under dilute conditions. With the scale-up, these limitations can play a significant role, and the amount of CO 2 sequestered may decrease further.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%