2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tri-objective generator maintenance scheduling model based on sequential strategy

Abstract: A multi-objective modeling approach is required in the context of generator maintenance scheduling (GMS) for power generation systems. Most multi-objective modeling approaches in practice are modeled using a periodic system approach that caters for a fixed maintenance window. This approach is not suitable for different types of generating units and cannot extend the generator lifespan. To address this issue, this study proposes a tri-objective GMS model with three conflicting objectives based on the sequential… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shatha Abdulhadi Muthana and Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud [18] To determine the optimal choice for scheduling generator maintenance, various multi-objective optimization methods were examined. One optimization method, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm, exemplifies the importance of utilizing GA and optimization in a variety of scientific fields.…”
Section: Implementation Of Gamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shatha Abdulhadi Muthana and Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud [18] To determine the optimal choice for scheduling generator maintenance, various multi-objective optimization methods were examined. One optimization method, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm, exemplifies the importance of utilizing GA and optimization in a variety of scientific fields.…”
Section: Implementation Of Gamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental evaluation is conducted on the proposed system (OC), UC, NC , and QC. The fitness comparisons are illustrated in Figures (16)(17)(18)(19), which depict the comparison between the initial population fitness and populations that have undergone optimization using UC, NC, QC and OC. Fig.…”
Section: Binary Crossover Under Phase Twomentioning
confidence: 99%