2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0463-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tri-generation power plant and conventional boilers: pollutant flow rate and atmospheric impact of stack emissions

Abstract: The atmospheric impact of stack emissions from a power plant (tri-generator and boilers) that will be installed in an urban area in the central Po valley (Northern Italy), characterized by calm wind events, is studied and compared with the impact of the existing plant (conventional boilers). Both the plants are supplied by methane gas. The atmospheric dispersion of NO x emitted is simulated, both in the current and future scenario, by the software package ARIA INDUSTRY. The NO x emission rates are set equal to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure is premised on the evidence that direct pesticide drift and the aerial volatilization and spreading of these compounds following their applications in fields leads to residential exposure. The aerial transport of a pollutant from its source to a point of exposition is usually assessed using atmospheric dispersion models [ 41 , 42 ]. However, in the present study the complexity of the sources (hundreds of fields with pesticides emission rate not quantifiable) prevented the use of such models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is premised on the evidence that direct pesticide drift and the aerial volatilization and spreading of these compounds following their applications in fields leads to residential exposure. The aerial transport of a pollutant from its source to a point of exposition is usually assessed using atmospheric dispersion models [ 41 , 42 ]. However, in the present study the complexity of the sources (hundreds of fields with pesticides emission rate not quantifiable) prevented the use of such models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model operates in non-stationary conditions by approximating temporal variations in successive stationary states. SPRAY gives highly reliable simulations of pollutant dispersion close to the release source point [30,31], and it is able to simulate deposition-decay phenomena. SPRAY supplies a three-dimensional concentration field, vertically subdivided into grid cells at different terrain-following layers, and vertically stretched to obtain higher resolution near the ground.…”
Section: Software and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all these techniques need a large number of in-situ observations at strategic locations to represent the full spatial and temporal pollutant variability and cannot be used to take into account turbulent atmospheric dispersion. To meet this need, a variety of micro (Moussafir et al, 2004(Moussafir et al, , Öttl, 2015 and local (Tinarelli et al, 1992, Bellasio and Bianconi, 2012, Cimorelli et al, 2004 scale air dispersion models have been developed in the last few years, as they can provide a high-resolution information on air pollution level within urban city area by taking into account space-time emissions distribution and local meteorological characteristics (Ghermandi et al, 2014, Ghermandi et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%