The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1002/prop.201200117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tri‐bimaximal neutrino mixing and discrete flavour symmetries

Abstract: We review the application of non-Abelian discrete groups to Tri-Bimaximal (TB) neutrino mixing, which is supported by experiment as a possible good first approximation to the data. After summarizing the motivation and the formalism, we discuss specific models, mainly those based on A4 but also on other finite groups, and their phenomenological implications, including the extension to quarks. The recent measurements of θ13 favour versions of these models where a suitable mechanism leads to corrections to θ13 th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
106
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 244 publications
2
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus one is naturally led to discrete flavour groups. Models based on discrete flavour symmetries, like A 4 or S 4 , have been proposed in this context and widely studied [56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. In these models the starting Leading Order (LO) approximation is completely fixed (no chance), but the Next to LO (NLO) corrections still introduce a number of undetermined parameters, although in general much less numerous than for U(1) FN models.…”
Section: Jhep11(2012)139mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus one is naturally led to discrete flavour groups. Models based on discrete flavour symmetries, like A 4 or S 4 , have been proposed in this context and widely studied [56][57][58][59][60][61][62]. In these models the starting Leading Order (LO) approximation is completely fixed (no chance), but the Next to LO (NLO) corrections still introduce a number of undetermined parameters, although in general much less numerous than for U(1) FN models.…”
Section: Jhep11(2012)139mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class of theories exhibited very predictive mass textures [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and provided a certain protection from flavour violating processes [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. However, the 2011 discovery of a nonvanishing, and relatively large, leptonic reactor angle [35][36][37][38][39] has raised strong doubts on the use of non-Abelian discrete models, whose most common prediction was a vanishing reactor angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of antisymmetry is found to be more predictive than symmetry. It is able to restrict both neutrino masses and mixing angles unlike all the previous works in this category which [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] could predict only mixing angles. Moreover, the antisymmetry condition by itself is sufficient for determining all possible discrete residual antisymmetry operators S ν residing in SU(3).…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)186mentioning
confidence: 99%