2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map.2018.5323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tri‐band planar monopole antenna with two circularly polarised bandwidths for WiMAX applications

Abstract: A tri‐band planar monopole antenna with one linearly polarised band, two circularly polarised bands, and bidirectional radiation patterns is presented in this study. The antenna consists of a monopole with seven arms etched on the top side of a FR4 substrate, and a slitted ground plane on the bottom side. Measured results show that the antenna has a S11<−10 dB impedance bandwidth of 9.7% (2.05–2.26 GHz) for the lower band, 11.3% (3.41–3.82 GHz) for the middle band, and 60.2% (4.89–9.11 GHz) for the upper band.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past few years, several designs have been investigated on multiband antennas for WLAN and WiMAX applications. L-shaped arms, a slitted feedline, and a slitted ground plane were used to excite three different resonances in [3]. The antenna in [4] was composed of a rectangular ring, a fork-shaped strip, a modified 1-shaped stub, and a coplanar waveguide to achieve tri-band operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, several designs have been investigated on multiband antennas for WLAN and WiMAX applications. L-shaped arms, a slitted feedline, and a slitted ground plane were used to excite three different resonances in [3]. The antenna in [4] was composed of a rectangular ring, a fork-shaped strip, a modified 1-shaped stub, and a coplanar waveguide to achieve tri-band operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Federal Communication Commission (FCC) permitted UWB transmitters to operate in the spectrum from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz in 2002 due to its efficient commercial UWB communication technologies [11]. However, these antennas have serious electromagnetic interference problems, as there are several other narrowband wireless communication systems, such as WLAN (2.4-2.5 GHz), Wi-MAX (3.5-3.7 GHz), high data rate HIPERLAN/2 bands (5.15-5.35 and 5.470-5.725 GHz), and the IEEE 802.11a bands (5.15-5.35 and 5.725-5.825 GHz) functioning in the same frequency spectrum [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circularly polarized (CP) antenna [1][2][3] have been widely studied owing to the superior ability to mitigate multipath interference and reduce polarization mismatch. Compared with single CP antennas, CP antenna arrays (CPAAs) [4][5][6][7] have also been attracting increasing attention in recent years owing to their advantages in terms of improving the radiation pattern and increasing gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%