1994
DOI: 10.1039/dt9940000477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tri- and tetra-nuclear µ-alkyne clusters from [Ru2(µ-CO)(µ-C2R2)(η-C5H5)2](R = Ph or CF3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be envisaged that the trinuclear complex 7 is formed via addition of a free radical fragment such as [Ru(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 5 )] across the unsaturated metal-metal bond of the diruthenium complex 5, since a similar process involving addition of monometallic fragments across a ruthenium-ruthenium double bond has been effected in this laboratory, leading to the formation of a range of trinuclear µ 3 -alkyne complexes. 14 If this suggestion were correct, initial formation of 5 from 2i,j might be expected, with a build up of 7 at longer time. However, varying the time of photolysis affects only the yields of the products 5-7, which reach a maximum after 20 h, and does not significantly change their ratios, strongly suggesting that they are formed from 2i,j via distinct pathways.…”
Section: Photolysis Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It might be envisaged that the trinuclear complex 7 is formed via addition of a free radical fragment such as [Ru(CO) 2 (η-C 5 H 5 )] across the unsaturated metal-metal bond of the diruthenium complex 5, since a similar process involving addition of monometallic fragments across a ruthenium-ruthenium double bond has been effected in this laboratory, leading to the formation of a range of trinuclear µ 3 -alkyne complexes. 14 If this suggestion were correct, initial formation of 5 from 2i,j might be expected, with a build up of 7 at longer time. However, varying the time of photolysis affects only the yields of the products 5-7, which reach a maximum after 20 h, and does not significantly change their ratios, strongly suggesting that they are formed from 2i,j via distinct pathways.…”
Section: Photolysis Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The interatomic distances of Fe1−Fe2 (2.5119(8) Å), Fe1−Fe4 (2.4792(9) Å), Fe2−Fe3 (2.5025(8) Å), Fe2−Fe4 (2.5837(8) Å), and Fe3−Fe4 (2.4995(8) Å) indicate that these represent the five iron−iron bonds, whereas the value of Fe1···Fe3 (3.4385(8) Å) indicates that there is no interaction for these atoms . According to the structural features described, cluster 6 is recognized as an Fe 4 C 2 closo octahedron, consistent with Wade−Mingos theory. ,
2
2 ORTEP drawing of (η 5 -C 5 H 4 Me) 4 Fe 4 (μ 3 -CO) 2 (HCCH) ( 6 ). The C 5 H 4 Me ligands are omitted for clarity.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the established routes to higher nuclearity alkyne clusters is the reaction of preformed alkyne complexes with suitable metal fragments. Initially our objective in this work was to explore whether compounds of type 1 could be used as precursors to higher nuclearity alkyne clusters, since similar cluster-forming reactions are already known for related alkyne complexes such as Co 2 (CO) 6 (μ-R 1 C 2 R 2 ), Ni 2 (μ-C 2 Ph 2 )Cp 2 , and recently Ru 2 (μ-CO)(μ-C 2 R 2 )Cp 2 (R = Ph, CF 3 ). 3e,4f-h, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%