1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf02279281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trennung einiger Thyreostatica durch Hochdruck-Flüssigkeits-Chromatographie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection limits in the low mg/L range are comparable or better than those obtained in the chromatographic assays. The advantages of this CE method over HPLC [5][6][7] are the following: it is rapid; it does not require solvent gradient or column equilibration, and no organic solvents are needed for elution purposes. Compared with GC methods [8][9][10], this approach is simpler, more rapid, and inexpensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detection limits in the low mg/L range are comparable or better than those obtained in the chromatographic assays. The advantages of this CE method over HPLC [5][6][7] are the following: it is rapid; it does not require solvent gradient or column equilibration, and no organic solvents are needed for elution purposes. Compared with GC methods [8][9][10], this approach is simpler, more rapid, and inexpensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and animal feeds; these include TLC [4], HPLC with UV and/or electrochemical detection [5][6][7], GC with electron-capture nitrogen-phosphorus, or mass spectrometric detection [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only Buick et al (1998) was able to reach a lower LOD, in the range of 10 g kg −1 [65]. As for the detection UV (ultraviolet) [85][86][87][88][89][90], electrochemical [88,89], chemiluminescence [91] and diode array detection (DAD) [65] were reported. With the introduction of atmospheric pressure interfaces like ESI (electrospray ionization) and APCI (atmospheric pressure chemical ionization), liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) became the method of choice for (thyreostatic) residue control [52,61,64].…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of methods have been developed for the determination of thyreostatics residue in samples, such as highperformance thin layer chromatography [7], HPLC with ultraviolet (UV) or electrochemical or MS detection [8][9][10], GC with electron-capture or nitrogen-phosphorus or MS detection [11][12][13][14], our recently developed flow-injection analysis equipped with electrochemiluminescent detector [15], electrochemical analysis [16][17][18][19][20] and electrophoresis [21][22][23]. Although GC and HPLC are powerful analytical methods, they suffer from relatively high instrumental cost, use of too much samples and solvents, which may increase environmental burden, and too much time consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%