2015
DOI: 10.1111/idh.12164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends over 30 years in the prevalence and severity of alveolar bone loss and the influence of smoking and socio‐economic factors – based on epidemiological surveys in Sweden 1983–2013

Abstract: ObjectiveEpidemiological studies of the prevalence of periodontitis over an extended time using the same methodology to investigate and classify periodontitis are sparse in the literature. Smoking and socio‐economic factors have been proven to increase the risk for periodontal disease. The objective of this study was to investigate 30‐year time trends, using the same methodology to classify the prevalence and severity in alveolar bone loss (ABL) and to investigate the influence of tobacco and socio‐economic fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample was then grouped into five age intervals: 30‐41, 42‐58, 59‐71, 72‐77 and 78‐85 years, resulting in mean ages as close to 35 (35.2), 50 (50.2), 65 (65.2), 75 (74.7) and 85 (80.5) as possible (Table ). For further details, see Edman et al …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sample was then grouped into five age intervals: 30‐41, 42‐58, 59‐71, 72‐77 and 78‐85 years, resulting in mean ages as close to 35 (35.2), 50 (50.2), 65 (65.2), 75 (74.7) and 85 (80.5) as possible (Table ). For further details, see Edman et al …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of ABL was based on bone levels at interproximal sites visible on radiographs in the premolar and molar regions, and categorized into “no bone loss,” “moderate bone loss” and “severe bone loss.” The categorization of ABL was performed by two of the authors, and manifest caries was confirmed on bite‐wing radiographs by the authors. Details regarding the different parameters have been reported in greater detail elsewhere . Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) were determined by three anamnestic questions, based on validated self‐reported pain questions: “Have you constantly or often (once a week or more) problems with ache in the jaws or face?”; “Are you tired or exhausted (once a week or more) in the jaws when, for example, chewing?”; “Have you often (once a week or more) problems with opening wide or locking of the jaw?” The response alternatives were “yes” or “no.” The three TMD‐questions were dichotomized into (0) “no TMD problems” and (1) “TMD problems” (response to at least one of the three questions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly the approximal cleaning, the snacking and the smoking habits of German adults need to be improved, whereby the high smoking rates combined with low approximal self-care might be responsible for the comparatively poor periodontal status of the adult German population [18,23,47].…”
Section: Possible Reasons For Variations In System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies have demonstrated that smokers have the more severe periodontal disease [162][163][164]. A recent country wide epidemiological study conducted in Sweden suggested a strong association between smoking and moderate and severe alveolar bone loss overall [165]. In a cohort study carried out in New Zealand, it has been found that the extent and prevalence of alveolar bone loss was greater in smokers compared to never smokers and former smokers [166].…”
Section: Periodontal Diseases and Tobacco Smokingmentioning
confidence: 99%