2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in urinary arsenic among the U.S. population by drinking water source: Results from the National Health and Nutritional Examinations Survey 2003–2014

Abstract: Overall, urinary arsenic levels in the U.S. population declined over a 12-year period that encompassed the adoption of the revised Arsenic Rule. The most consistent trends in declining exposure were observed among non-smoking individuals using public community water systems. These results suggest regulation and prevention strategies to reduce arsenic exposures in the U.S. may be succeeding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported previously, , GW systems are more vulnerable to As contamination than SW systems because of geological conditions. Additionally, most violations occurred in very small water systems (<500 served).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…As reported previously, , GW systems are more vulnerable to As contamination than SW systems because of geological conditions. Additionally, most violations occurred in very small water systems (<500 served).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The current U.S. standard was reduced from 50 ppb to 10 ppb by the U.S. EPA’s 2001 Revised Arsenic Rule. In a recent study, Welch et al, (2017) report that arsenic levels in the general U.S. population have declined over a 12-year period in accordance with the Revised Arsenic Rule [ 52 ]. Although the current MCL fails to consider cardiovascular outcomes, diabetes, and preclinical indictors of CVD that may be associated with arsenic exposures below 10 ppb, the present study suggests that an MCL of 10 ppb arsenic is adequate to prevent arsenic exposure from contributing to metabolic syndrome in the general U.S. population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all waters are subject to EPA standards, potentially placing an unequal health burden on regions with naturally higher arsenic concentrations and greater reliance on unregulated water sources. Approximately 12% of the U.S. population is served by domestic wells that are not regulated by the EPA, and 11–19% of private wells are estimated to contain arsenic in excess of 10 ppb [ 52 , 53 ]. For example, rural areas of the U.S. with a higher proportion of un-piped water report much higher concentrations of groundwater arsenic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion has now led to a lowering of As limits in drinking water in many countries. The United States has subsequently lowered the permissible limit from 50 μg/L to 10 μg/L (Welch et al 2018), while in Canada the limit has been lowered from 50 μg/L to 25 μg/L, with a proposal to lower it further to 5 μg/L (Saint-Jacques et al 2018). The fact remains that no such lowering of the As levels is yet to be proposed in India and Bangladesh, the two countries where the exposure through groundwater is the most widespread and acute.…”
Section: Permissible Limits Of As In Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%