2018
DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20170152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in treatment of problematic cannabis use in Ontario’s specialized addiction treatment system from 2010/11 to 2015/16: a repeated cross-sectional study of a health administrative database

Abstract: Background: Little is known about trends in the treatment of problematic cannabis use in Canada. Trends in treatment utilization for problematic cannabis use were examined, as well as trends in the associated sociodemographic characteristics and frequency of cannabis use. Methods: This was a repeated cross-sectional study using data from the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Information System, capturing utilization of all community funded addiction treatment services in Ontario, Canada. Clients in treatment for thei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This possibility is supported by data from Statistics Canada, which estimated that the volume of cannabis consumed per year was stable through 2000 and 2009 and showed a rapid increase between 2010 and 2015, coinciding with the time period in our study when all ages and sexes saw increases in hospitalizations due to cannabis harms in Ontario 23 . In addition, while data from Ontario’s specialized addiction treatment system from 2010/11 to 2015/16 noted a decrease in the number of clients in treatment for problematic cannabis use they found an increase in the proportion reporting daily cannabis use 24 . Similarly, increases in cannabis potency, which has been well documented in other jurisdictions such as the U.S. and Europe between 2008 and 2017 may be driving increases in cannabis harms 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This possibility is supported by data from Statistics Canada, which estimated that the volume of cannabis consumed per year was stable through 2000 and 2009 and showed a rapid increase between 2010 and 2015, coinciding with the time period in our study when all ages and sexes saw increases in hospitalizations due to cannabis harms in Ontario 23 . In addition, while data from Ontario’s specialized addiction treatment system from 2010/11 to 2015/16 noted a decrease in the number of clients in treatment for problematic cannabis use they found an increase in the proportion reporting daily cannabis use 24 . Similarly, increases in cannabis potency, which has been well documented in other jurisdictions such as the U.S. and Europe between 2008 and 2017 may be driving increases in cannabis harms 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…23 In addition, while data from Ontario's specialized addiction treatment system from 2010/11 to 2015/16 noted a decrease in the number of clients in treatment for problematic cannabis use they found an increase in the proportion reporting daily cannabis use. 24 Similarly, increases in cannabis potency, which has been well documented in other jurisdictions such as the U.S. and Europe between 2008 and 2017 may be driving increases in cannabis harms. 25 The observed increases may also be partially explained by better awareness in diagnostic coding practices of cannabis-related harms by physicians (eg, cannabis hyperemesis syndrome).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as the authors acknowledge, there are many confounding determinants involved in such evaluations, including access to and availability of treatment, coercion, potency of used products, use of synthetic cannabinoids, help‐seeking behavior, stigmatization and public perception of cannabis use and associated problems. For instance, despite the liberalization of cannabis in Canada, with increases in use over the past years, there have been decreases in treatment rates, partly because liberalization seems to have led to higher thresholds for treatment seeking, as use per se is no longer considered problematic 3 . As long as these confounding determinants cannot be disentangled, treatment demand data should probably not be used as an indicator to evaluate the public health effects of legalization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%