2020
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in the use of automated algorithms for the detection of high‐frequency oscillations associated with human epilepsy

Abstract: Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting more than 65 million people worldwide. 1 Roughly one third of patients with epilepsy have poorly controlled seizures despite optimal treatment with medication. 2 In such cases, surgical resection of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is an alternative and effective treatment. 3,4 Postsurgical seizure freedom depends on the accurate localization of the EZ, but there are currently no validated biomarkers of the EZ. 5,6 The present gold standard for ep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(192 reference statements)
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing our neuromorphic SNN with other HFO detectors proposed in the literature 35 , 36 , several differences and commonalities become evident. As a conceptual difference, the SNN proposed here models many of the features found in biological neural processing systems, such as the temporal dynamics of the neuron and synapse elements, or the variability in their time constants, refractory periods, and synaptic weights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When comparing our neuromorphic SNN with other HFO detectors proposed in the literature 35 , 36 , several differences and commonalities become evident. As a conceptual difference, the SNN proposed here models many of the features found in biological neural processing systems, such as the temporal dynamics of the neuron and synapse elements, or the variability in their time constants, refractory periods, and synaptic weights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Different from epileptic spikes, HFOs do not propagate, which is an advantage if the EZ needs to be localized precisely (9, 16). A growing number of studies relates the presence of HFOs to surgical outcome (20, 28). A prospective, automated definition of HFOs renders HFO analysis more generalizable (7, 18, 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations in the clinical relevance of the HFOs have been facilitated by automated or semi-automated detection algorithms (20). Here we apply a fully automated definition of HFOs, which we previously optimized on visual markings in a dataset of the Montreal Neurological Institute (21) and then validated on independently recorded data from Zurich (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated detection of HFOs remains challenging, as it produces inconsistent results across methods, though several automatic detectors have been developed ( Crépon et al, 2010 ; Zelmann et al, 2010 , 2012 ; Cimbalnik et al, 2018 ; Donos et al, 2020 ; Lachner-Piza et al, 2020 ; Lai et al, 2020 ; for review, see Remakanthakurup Sindhu et al, 2020 ). One significant challenge that remains for automatic detectors is distinguishing HFOs from artifactual spikes as well as epileptiform EEG spikes, because their spectrograms overlap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%