2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2529335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in the Returns to Social Assimilation: Earnings Premiums Among U.S. Immigrants that Marry Natives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intermarriage rate is a two-way indicator of social integration. On the one hand, it indicates the acceptance of the immigrant population by the host society; on the other hand, it demonstrates the level of immigrants’ acceptance of the native population (among others, see Alba & Golden, 1986; Dribe & Lundh, 2008; Dribe & Nystedt, 2009; Furtado & Song, 2014; Furtado & Theodoropoulos, 2009; Gevrek, 2009; Kantarevic, 2004; Nekby, 2010). However, intermarriage does not solely indicate the degree of integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intermarriage rate is a two-way indicator of social integration. On the one hand, it indicates the acceptance of the immigrant population by the host society; on the other hand, it demonstrates the level of immigrants’ acceptance of the native population (among others, see Alba & Golden, 1986; Dribe & Lundh, 2008; Dribe & Nystedt, 2009; Furtado & Song, 2014; Furtado & Theodoropoulos, 2009; Gevrek, 2009; Kantarevic, 2004; Nekby, 2010). However, intermarriage does not solely indicate the degree of integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results may vary due to the different stock of immigrants; however, the number of studies that address the issue of an intermarriage wage premium among women—accounting simultaneously for selection into employment and selection into intermarriage—is limited (for an exception, see Meng & Meurs, 2009). From a geographical perspective, literature dealing with an intermarriage wage premium has focused on Northern and Western European countries, such as Sweden (Dribe & Lundh, 2008; Dribe & Nystedt, 2009; Nekby, 2010), the Netherlands (Gevrek, 2009), Germany (Nottmeyer, 2010), and France (Meng & Meurs, 2009); or other continents, including the U.S. (Furtado & Song, 2014; Kantarevic, 2004) and Australia (Meng & Gregory, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%