Trends in the growth of literature of telemedicine: A bibliometric analysis

Yang, Ya-Ting; Iqbal, Usman; Ching, Jack Horn-Yu; Ting, Jonathan; Chiu, Hsien-Tsai; Tamashiro, Hiko; Hsu, Yi-Hsin

doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.09.008

Cited by 52 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The geographic distributions of scientific research productivity might reflect the research capabilities and technological developments of different countries [9]. We found that 55.80 % of total articles in the field of forensic dentistry published by the top 10 countries, indicating that the worldwide research in forensic dentistry was also concentrated as in other medical fileds [10,11]. The USA, as expected, was by far the most absolute productive country, accounting for nearly 20 % of the total research output in the field of forensic dentistry.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…PubMed is the most widely used database for bibliometric analysis, but it does not contain all biomedical journals and is biased in favor of English journals [12]. Non-English articles and those "gray literature" could not be obtained easily [11]. Thirdly, another common situation is that the first author, in some cases, could be a student from a developing country for short-term research training in a developed country, while the corresponding author who supervises the project is in a developed country [13][14][15][16].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Worldwide trends of forensic dentistry: a 20-year bibliometric analysis in Pubmed

Liu¹,

Liu²,

Jia³

et al. 2016

RJLM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the worldwide research productivity of forensic dentistry during the past 20 years (1996-2015) by bibliometric analysis. ''Forensic Dentistry'' was searched as the Medical Subject Headings term in PubMed and a total of 665 articles were retrieved. There were mainly 56 countries contributing to publications on forensic dentistry and the United States of America was the most productive country. 188 different journals were found and three journals were identified as core journals according to Bradford's law. Personal identification was the most popular topic. The basic and recognized methodology applied in the present study provides a relative wide view on scientific productivity of forensic dentistry and allows us to understand this field better.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Worldwide trends of forensic dentistry: a 20-year bibliometric analysis in Pubmed

Liu¹,

Liu²,

Jia³

et al. 2016

RJLM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other limitations using ClinicalTrials.gov included the quality of data that may have potentially been misled in the data analysis and the risk that the research performed did not capture all registered trials [22][23][24]. The assessment of published results using bibliometric data for clinical trials in telemedicine could have been suitable [25], however, limitations from potential publication bias of non-published results may have arisen [26][27][28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Telemedicine in France: A review of registered clinical trials from 2000 to 2015

Ohannessian

Yaghobian

Chaleuil³

et al. 2016

European Research in Telemedicine / La Recherche Européenne en

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Even though PubMed is the most widely used database for bibliometric analysis, it is biased in favor of English journals and not all biomedical journals are included. 19 Exclusion of non-English articles might underestimate the research capabilities of some countries. Thirdly, only the first author's affiliation was indexed in PubMed before 2014 and therefore the affiliation showed only one country and fails to identify collaborative research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Worldwide tendency and perspectives in traumatic dental injuries: A bibliometric analysis over two decades (1999‐2018)

Liu

et al. 2020

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims Traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) are considered to be a public dental health problem worldwide. The aim of the current study was to provide the worldwide tendency and perspectives in TDIs in the last two decades via bibliometric analysis. Methods ‘‘Tooth injuries’’ was searched as the Medical Subject Headings term within PubMed with the date range from 1999 to 2018. Two investigators perused information in the articles according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles were independently categorized according to the following aspects: (a) annual scholarly output; (b) leading countries or regions; (c) leading journals; (d) productive authors; (e) citations; (f) study design; (f) distribution of topics; and (g) the type of dentition and TDIs. VOSviewer 1.6.7 and Citespace 5.2 were used for analyzing and visualizing bibliometric networks. Results A total of 2627 articles about traumatic dental injuries were published and indexed in PubMed during the two decades, and the number of publications on traumatic dental injuries was rising in general. The research outputs were mainly concentrated in developed countries and affiliated hospitals of universities. Brazil was the most productive country. The journal Dental Traumatology had the most contributions to the scientific research of traumatic dental injuries. “Case report” was the most frequent type of article (36.50%), followed by cross‐sectional studies (19.57%) and case‐control studies (13.67%). Most studies focused on the treatment of TDIs (38.94%), especially for avulsion (21.01%), crown fracture (9.71%), and intrusion (5.25%). Permanent teeth (66%) were the dominant dentition. Conclusion There is a lack of high‐quality well‐designed studies such as cohort studies. The number of publications on prevention and the primary dentition is disproportionate in relation to their significance.

show abstract

Trends in the growth of literature of telemedicine: A bibliometric analysis

Cited by 52 publications

References 17 publications

Worldwide trends of forensic dentistry: a 20-year bibliometric analysis in Pubmed

Worldwide trends of forensic dentistry: a 20-year bibliometric analysis in Pubmed

Telemedicine in France: A review of registered clinical trials from 2000 to 2015

Worldwide tendency and perspectives in traumatic dental injuries: A bibliometric analysis over two decades (1999‐2018)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About