Trends in the Development of the Ural Macroregion’s Economic Space

Silin, Yakov; Animitsa, Yevgeny G.; Novikova, Natalya

doi:10.29141/2218-5003-2017-4-2-1

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…New spatial and strategic approaches to the analysis of regional economic systems and changes in the structure of the economy involve the study of factors and, first of all, the sufficiency of resource provision for development in terms of localization of employed, fixed assets [1][2][3][4], concentration processes, cooperation and the scale of regional industrial production [5][6], the growth rate of gross value added, the rate of structural shifts, in the commodity filling of exports and the level of its manufacturability, as the most significant indicator of the competitiveness of the economy [7][8][9] and others. It should be noted that the analysis of the susceptibility of the regional economy to crises and, as a consequence, the cyclical changes in the level of concentration / diversification in the sector of core activities, due to both exogenous and endogenous causes, including a change in scientific and technological platforms 3 , does not go unnoticed by researchers [10][11][12][13].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of effective industry benchmarks for the development of mono-specialized regions

Danilova

Pravdina

2021

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of the industrial potential of the regions is an urgent task of state policy and requires the development of a set of measures that can take into account not only the structural characteristics of the regional economy, but also the efficiency of the industries. A coupled assessment of changes in concentration and efficiency will allow to get a more complete picture of the sectoral structure of the region’s economy and to more accurately rank measures of state support. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the criteria and assess the unidirectionality (multidirectionality) of shifts in industry concentration and efficiency on the example of monospecialized regions of the metallurgical profile. In the work, the assessment of the localization and efficiency of manufacturing industries by regions was carried out, the positioning of the regions according to the corresponding indicators and their comparative studies were carried out, taking into account the growth rates of the regional economy. According to the results of the assessment, the regions showed a different nature of changes in the manufacturing industry. The Krasnoyarsk Territory has demonstrated a high degree of efficiency with a low localization of the industry, while the growth rates of the regional economy are relatively low, which may indicate the ongoing restructuring processes in the manufacturing industry in favor of more competitive industries. The Chelyabinsk Region showed the highest localization with low efficiency, with the exception of investment efficiency, which may indicate difficulties in transforming the region’s sectoral structure. The focus of further research can be aimed at assessing detailed types of activities within the manufacturing industry in order to identify the factors of ongoing changes and develop point measures to support the relevant industries. Keywords: effective specialization of regions, regional development, localization of activities, sectoral efficiency, monospecialized regions, sectoral benchmarks.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of effective industry benchmarks for the development of mono-specialized regions

Danilova

Pravdina

2021

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Понятие индустриального региона, критерии его выделения, особенности и факторы развития представлены в ряде исследований [1][2][3][4][5][6]. В качестве критериев выделения индустриальных регионов авторами, как правило, отмечается преимущественное развитие промышленности, прежде всего -обрабатывающих производств [7].…”

Section: степень изученности и проработанности проблемыunclassified

“…2 Валовая добавленная стоимость на душу населения в текущих ценах 2018 г 3. Позиции 4 и 5 рассчитаны на основе объема отгруженных товаров собственного производства, выполненных работ и услуг собственными силами по видам экономической деятельности.Игнатьева Е.…”

unclassified

The Impact of Infrastructure Provision on Economic Growth in Industrial Regions of the Russian Federation

Ignatieva¹,

Serkova²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the research, which constitutes the content of this article, is to analyze the impact of infrastructure provision on economic growth in industrial regions, as well as to substantiate the methodological approach to this analysis. Infrastructure and its constituent parts (production-economic, social and financial infrastructures) as an important factor in industrial and innovative development is the main subject of this study, and the industrial regions of the Russian Federation are chosen as the object of our study. The purpose of the study, as well as the specifics of the object of study determined the choice of the approach to this study. The realization of the approach involved the implementation of certain stages of the study. At the first stage, taking into account existing Russian and foreign studies, the criteria and indicators of industrial development were substantiated. Based on these, a sample of industrial-type regions from the entire set of regions (subjects of the Russian Federation) was built. At the second stage, the indicators of the provision of industrial regions with the three above-mentioned types of infrastructure were calculated using the algorithms proposed by the authors. The third stage consisted in the construction of econometric models of the dependence of economic growth on infrastructure factors. On the basis of the proposed approach, comparative estimates of infrastructure security were obtained and ratings of industrial regions were built on this basis. After performing the econometric analysis, the most significant infrastructure factors were selected, and their influence on the economic growth of this group of the Russian regions was assessed. The results of the study, according to the authors, can be useful for developing directions of the infrastructural development of industrial Russian regions as a condition for the smooth functioning of high-tech enterprises and ensuring economic growth under sanctions.

show abstract

“…Yu., Novikova N. V. and etc.) considers «single -industry cities» and «CATE« as historically established models of industrial development, and the «priority development areas», created on their basis as the entire Ural macroregion growth poles [2][3][4][5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Target points for professional educational organizations development in territories with special organization of production and residence

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article defines the target points for the secondary vocational education organizations, located in territories that simultaneously have the status of “single-industry city”, “closed administrative-territorial unit” and “advanced development zone” development (the cities of Seversk, Ozersk, Snezhinsk, Zheleznogorsk, Zarechny). Based on information and analytical materials for the training quality monitoring, vectors allowing these institutions to achieve high indicators of both “The national project “Education”“ and the territorial development indicators values have been formed. The main designated target points are global trends, regional projects within the framework of Federal projects, priority economic activities in these territories, and the interests of city – forming enterprises.

show abstract

Trends in the Development of the Ural Macroregion’s Economic Space

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Selection of effective industry benchmarks for the development of mono-specialized regions

Selection of effective industry benchmarks for the development of mono-specialized regions

The Impact of Infrastructure Provision on Economic Growth in Industrial Regions of the Russian Federation

Target points for professional educational organizations development in territories with special organization of production and residence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About