2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.61.8516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in sputter yield data in the film deposition regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not find the peaks of t-BiVO 4 for the For our molybdenum-doped BiVO 4 films, the concentration of Mo is about 10 at% relative to V, as determined by RBS. This concentration gave the highest photocurrents for the Mo-doped BiVO 4 samples studied by Park et al 21 No Mo-related XRD peaks were observed, suggesting that Mo does not segregate out of the BiVO 4 lattice even for a concentration of 10 at% Mo. However, the possibility of small amounts of amorphous or nanocrystalline MoO x phases cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Structure and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, we did not find the peaks of t-BiVO 4 for the For our molybdenum-doped BiVO 4 films, the concentration of Mo is about 10 at% relative to V, as determined by RBS. This concentration gave the highest photocurrents for the Mo-doped BiVO 4 samples studied by Park et al 21 No Mo-related XRD peaks were observed, suggesting that Mo does not segregate out of the BiVO 4 lattice even for a concentration of 10 at% Mo. However, the possibility of small amounts of amorphous or nanocrystalline MoO x phases cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Structure and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[50][51][52][53][54][55][56] As mentioned earlier, ion energy and angle of incidence are the same for both in situ and ex situ plasma treatments and, hence, will not affect the sputter yield. The sputtering yield is inversely proportional to binding energy and mass ratio.…”
Section: Difference Between the In Situ And Ex Situ Plasma Treatmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sputtering yield is inversely proportional to binding energy and mass ratio. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56] From the Ti 2 p XPS spectra, it is found that TiO 2 has a higher binding energy than TiN. For any given energy distribution of ions bombarding the substrate surface during plasma treatment, the bombarding ions should break more TiuN bonds than TiuO bonds, i.e., more Ti atoms would be sputtered from the TiN surface ͑in situ sample͒ than the TiO 2 surface ͑ex situ sample͒.…”
Section: Difference Between the In Situ And Ex Situ Plasma Treatmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At energy range near the threshold energy, the sputtering yields measured in experiment are often inconsistency and poor reproducibility, hence resulting in the lack of understanding for the microscopic mechanisms of low-energy sputtering. 23 From the viewpoints of atomic collisions, the low-energy sputtering involves in the first few layers in the substrates. The motions of projectiles and recoils should be related to the atomic mass ratio of projectile to target atoms and the sputtering mechanisms might be different for the cases of M 1 < M 2 and M 1 ≥ M 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%