2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Prices of Drugs Used to Treat Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US From 2015 to 2020

Abstract: This cross-sectional study examines trends in costs of brand-name medications for treatment of non–small cell lung cancer and within-class price differences between these medications in the US from 2015 to 2020.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer drugs are very expensive in the United States (see Table 1 for drug prices). Even though there are multiple drugs in each class targeting an oncogene product, in-class competition does not appear to put a downward pressure on prices as happens in other areas of the economy, and prices continue to remain high [ 135 , 136 ]. Since global pricing follows the United States pricing, targeted drugs for oncogene-addicted NSCLC remain high globally and, in most countries, these agents are unaffordable to the majority of the NSCLC population [ 136 , 137 ].…”
Section: Cost and Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer drugs are very expensive in the United States (see Table 1 for drug prices). Even though there are multiple drugs in each class targeting an oncogene product, in-class competition does not appear to put a downward pressure on prices as happens in other areas of the economy, and prices continue to remain high [ 135 , 136 ]. Since global pricing follows the United States pricing, targeted drugs for oncogene-addicted NSCLC remain high globally and, in most countries, these agents are unaffordable to the majority of the NSCLC population [ 136 , 137 ].…”
Section: Cost and Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that immunotherapy for early-stage NSCLC may follow the pattern established in advanced NSCLC, where survival has been significantly improved for most patients. However, the benefits in the early-stage setting must be weighed against the adverse effects and risks of adding immunotherapy, including the substantial financial toxicity with these expensive therapies . The optimal timing, duration, and sequence of immunotherapy with other systemic therapies are only now beginning to be defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the benefits in the early-stage setting must be weighed against the adverse effects and risks of adding immunotherapy, including the substantial financial toxicity with these expensive therapies. 53 The optimal timing, duration, and sequence of immunotherapy with other systemic therapies are only now beginning to be defined.…”
Section: The Neoadjuvant Vs Adjuvant Immunotherapy Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching available therapies to older patients will be the main challenge for the next decades. In fact, anticancer therapies are becoming extremely expensive [17] and the risk of poor efficacy due to the erroneous assessment of eligibility should be avoided. Evaluation of molecular vulnerabilities of cancer cells should be integrated with reliable clinical assessment of the patient.…”
Section: Moving Forward and Beyond Body Composition Changes: Accelera...mentioning
confidence: 99%