2017
DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Opioid-related Inpatient Stays Shifted After the US Transitioned to ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Coding in 2015

Abstract: The sharp increase in opioid-related stays overall during the transition to ICD-10-CM may indicate that the new classification system is capturing stays that were missed by ICD-9-CM data. Estimates of stays involving other diagnoses may also be affected, and analysts should assess potential discontinuities in trends across the ICD transition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 This study period comprises hospitals’ first full year of ICD-10-CM diagnosis coding, which may be more sensitive to identify opioid-related hospital stays. 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 This study period comprises hospitals’ first full year of ICD-10-CM diagnosis coding, which may be more sensitive to identify opioid-related hospital stays. 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 Transition to ICD-10 in the later part of 2015 could account for about 14% of the increased rates observed during the transition, and 3.5% of the increased rates in 2016 owed to these coding changes. 61 Increased OP rates may be attributed to more individuals seeking care at the hospital during this period and may not be reflective of changing general population OP rates. Though rates for ZIP codes with small populations may not be stable with yearly variability, quartile analysis did not change quartiles for these ZIP codes.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To date, we are not aware of reporting that quantifies US prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) separate from overdoses using health services data, nor analysis of health services contacts (e.g., inpatient stay) during which patients were diagnosed with OUD in the absence of opioid overdose (Guy Jr., Pasalic, & Zhang, 2018; Heslin et al, 2017; Hsu, McCarthy, Stevens, & Mukamal, 2017; Tedesco et al, 2017; Weiss et al, 2016). Using the most recent five years of US national hospital discharge data, this brief report aimed to describe patient and clinical characteristics of discharges during which providers documented OUD among patients who were not treated for opioid overdose, opioid detoxification, or opioid rehabilitation during the inpatient stay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%