2023
DOI: 10.1111/cts.13660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in oncology drug lags in Japan from 2001 to 2020: A cross‐sectional study

Hideki Maeda,
Asuka Hara,
Momoka Ofuchi
et al.

Abstract: Anticancer drugs are essential in the treatment of serious diseases, but their applications are limited by drug lags. This study investigated the characteristics of anticancer drugs approved in Japan over the past 20 years and compared the drug lag trends between Japan and the US. We assessed the changes in drug lag between Japan and the US and the factors affecting the drug lags using publicly available data for anticancer drugs approved in Japan from January 2001 to December 2020. A total of 299 anticancer d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drug lag once existed in Japan, 22 and drug loss is still a problem. 23 Recently, several attempts have been made to improve early patient access through various designation schemes and incentives to shorten development and review periods. For example, there are mechanisms for shortening development time, such as the SAKIGAKE designation system 24 and conditional approval system, 25 and for obtaining approval for additional indications without conducting clinical trials, such as the Public Knowledge-based Application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug lag once existed in Japan, 22 and drug loss is still a problem. 23 Recently, several attempts have been made to improve early patient access through various designation schemes and incentives to shorten development and review periods. For example, there are mechanisms for shortening development time, such as the SAKIGAKE designation system 24 and conditional approval system, 25 and for obtaining approval for additional indications without conducting clinical trials, such as the Public Knowledge-based Application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%