2019
DOI: 10.18865/ed.29.3.525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Memory Problems and Race/Ethnicity in the National Health and Examination Survey, 1999-2014

Abstract: Background: Little data exist to describe serial population-level trends in cognitive impairment– especially among minority communities. Because memory problems are among the first warning signs of cogni­tive impairment, they provide a potential method for monitoring changes in cogni­tive health at the population level. This exploratory study aimed to: 1) estimate prevalence of memory problems among US residents by race/ethnicity, age category; and 2) examine whether racial/ethnic dif­ferences in subjective co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings varied between midlife (age 45 and older), and late-life (65 and older) Latinos, with older adults (14.8%–21.5%) exhibiting a higher burden of self-reported cognitive impairment than their younger counterparts (7.9%–11.2%). Although the age categories differ somewhat from prior studies using the NHIS, these results corroborate that older Latinos are at an increased risk of self-reported cognitive impairment compared to Whites ( Casillas et al, 2019 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings varied between midlife (age 45 and older), and late-life (65 and older) Latinos, with older adults (14.8%–21.5%) exhibiting a higher burden of self-reported cognitive impairment than their younger counterparts (7.9%–11.2%). Although the age categories differ somewhat from prior studies using the NHIS, these results corroborate that older Latinos are at an increased risk of self-reported cognitive impairment compared to Whites ( Casillas et al, 2019 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Thus, self-reported cognitive decline may represent one of the earliest noticeable indicators for decreased cognitive functioning ( Alzheimer’s Association, 2021 ; Jessen et al, 2014 ), as individuals who self-report cognitive decline are more likely to progress to cognitive impairment and dementia compared to those without SCD ( Donovan et al, 2014 ; Jessen et al, 2010 ; Mitchell et al, 2014 ; Wolfsgruber et al, 2016 ). Missed or delayed diagnoses of cognitive decline impede the ability to identify and treat individuals; conversely, early diagnosis of cognitive decline can facilitate the identification of treatable cases, and provide timely and accurate information to such individuals ( Casillas et al, 2019 ; Luo et al, 2018 ). Studies on self-reported cognitive decline may then offer an opportunity for interventions to identify and modify potentially treatable contributors to cognitive decline ( Livingston et al, 2017 ; Mukadam et al, 2019 ), so that appropriate resources and prevention efforts can be tailored to minority and immigrant groups to prevent or delay the onset of disease ( Dallo et al, 2021 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods are previously described in an NHANES study of the prevalence of US memory problems by race/ethnicity and age category for 20,585 participants ≥ 45 years during 1999-2014. 5 The outcome for this analysis was the response to the question: "Are you limited in any way because of difficulty remembering or because you experienced periods of confusion?" (yes/no).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature comparing racial groups within specific societies or residents of different world regions suggests that culture and subjective appraisal of cognition and function may be related. Findings are mixed with respect to difficulties with iADLs (Hackett et al, 2020; Tappen et al, 2010), and SCD (Borelli et al, 2022; Casillas et al, 2019; Garcia et al, 2021; Jackson et al, 2017; Jang et al, 2022; Nakhla et al, 2021; Pluim et al, 2023; Spitzer & Weber, 2019; Tolea et al, 2020; Wu, 2016). This variability in findings may be related to the use of various assessment approaches, disparities in study recruitment or access to care, and group differences in characteristics other than culture that may also contribute to SCD such as education, socioeconomic status, and depression (Borelli et al, 2022; Jang et al, 2022; Lee et al, 2021; Rodriguez et al, 2021; Spitzer & Weber, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%