Trends in key economic and social indicators for Pacific Northwest states and counties.

Raettig, Terry L.

doi:10.2737/pnw-gtr-474

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 1993, President Clinton convened the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (FEMAT 1993) as part of the effort to develop the Plan. The team was charged with identifying management alternatives for Pacific Northwest federal forests that would maximize social and economic benefits from the forests, while complying with environmental laws and regulations (FEMAT 1993: ii) (Christensen et al 2000;McGinnis et al 1996McGinnis et al , 1997Raettig 1999, Raettig et al 1996. The program also assessed the effectiveness of the Northwest Economic Adjustment Initiative (Christensen et al 1999, Raettig and.…”

Section: Limitations To the Budget Data And Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): socioeconomic monitoring results.

Charnley¹

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The socioeconomic monitoring report addresses two evaluation questions posed in the Northwest Forest Plan (the Plan) Record of Decision and assesses progress in meeting five Plan socioeconomic goals. Volume I of the report contains key findings. Volume II addresses the question, Are predictable levels of timber and nontimber resources available and being produced? It also evaluates progress in meeting the goal of producing a predictable level of timber sales, special forest products, livestock grazing, minerals, and recreation opportunities. The focus of volume III is the evaluation question, Are local communities and economies experiencing positive or negative changes that may be associated with federal forest management? Two Plan goals are also assessed in volume III: (1) to maintain the stability of local and regional economies on a predictable, long-term basis and, (2) to assist with long-term economic development and diversification to minimize adverse impacts associated with the loss of timber jobs. Progress in meeting anotherPlan goal-to promote agency-citizen collaboration in forest management-is evaluated in volume IV. Volume V reports on trends in public values regarding forest management in the Pacific Northwest over the past decade, community views of how well the forest values and environmental qualities associated with late-successional, old-growth, and aquatic ecosystems have been protected under the Plan (a fifth Plan goal), and issues and concerns relating to forest management under the Plan expressed by community members. Volume VI provides a history of the Northwest Forest Plan socioeconomic monitoring program and a discussion of potential directions for the program.

show abstract

Section: Limitations To the Budget Data And Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): socioeconomic monitoring results.

Charnley¹

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Biodiversity Conservation and Forest Products in the United States Pacific Northwest

Toppinen¹,

Adams

Montgomery

2001

World Forests, Markets and Policies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trends in key economic and social indicators for Pacific Northwest states and counties.

Abstract: Raettig, Terry L. 1999. Trends in key economic and social indicators for Pacific Northwest states and counties. Gen. Tech. Rep.

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): socioeconomic monitoring results.

Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): socioeconomic monitoring results.

Biodiversity Conservation and Forest Products in the United States Pacific Northwest

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About