1992
DOI: 10.2166/wst.1992.0390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Innovative Treatment Technologies at Contaminated Sites

Abstract: Increasing the diversity of technologies used to remediate contaminated soils and groundwater is one of the goals of EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER). While conventional methods of waste remediation, such as stabilization, containment, and incineration, are certainly valid approaches to resolving waste problems, statutory and economic considerations are now, more than ever, encouraging the entire remediation community to consider change in thinking and practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pseudo-first-order rate constants for these experiments are presented in Table 2 (exp. [1][2][3][4][5] and are plotted against Fe(II) dose in Figure 2(a). As shown in Figure 2(a), the rate constant increased nearly linearly with Fe(II) dose at low values and approached a maximum at high doses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pseudo-first-order rate constants for these experiments are presented in Table 2 (exp. [1][2][3][4][5] and are plotted against Fe(II) dose in Figure 2(a). As shown in Figure 2(a), the rate constant increased nearly linearly with Fe(II) dose at low values and approached a maximum at high doses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solidification/stabilization (S/S) is the most commonly used remedial alternative at superfund sites in the United States (1). Degradative solidification/stabilization (DS/S) is a modification of conventional S/S processes that promotes degradation and containment of organic contaminants while also immobilizing inorganic contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial degradation has been proposed as an efficient strategy for organic waste removal and it has distinct advantages over physico-chemical remediation methods; as it uses relatively low cost, low technology techniques, and may be carried out on site to achieve the complete degradation of organic pollutants without collateral destruction of the site material or its indigenous flora and fauna [5]. Also, biological processes and biodegradation of organic contaminants to innocuous end products (CO 2 , cell mass, water) minimizes the environmental impact and residual contamination [6,7]. However, anthropogenic chlorinated organic pollutants are now dispersed throughout the environment and can be highly recalcitrant to biodegradation processes found in most naturally occurring microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical, chemical and biological approaches can be used to remove xylene and other petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated sites. Microbial biodegradation is less expensive and hence considered one of the most promising alternative methods for cleaning up the environment from petroleum hydrocarbons (Kovalick, 1992;Vidali, 2001;Jahn et al, 2005;Vieira et al, 2007;Das and Chandran, 2011;Alrumman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%