1999
DOI: 10.1093/ije/28.6.1149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in HIV and AIDS based on HIV/AIDS surveillance data in Japan

Abstract: We suggest that the number of people with HIV among Japanese has continued to increase, and that the increase in the number of AIDS cases among Japanese is now slowing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain an estimate of all HIV infections, the reciprocal of this ratio was multiplied with the number of all reported infections. 9 Data were processed and analyzed using the Excel 2000, and SPSS 10 programs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain an estimate of all HIV infections, the reciprocal of this ratio was multiplied with the number of all reported infections. 9 Data were processed and analyzed using the Excel 2000, and SPSS 10 programs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the trend in the number of AIDS cases who were initially reported as having AIDS without having been previously reported as HIV-infected (initially reported AIDS cases) might reflect the number of people with undiagnosed HIV, which is important for monitoring through surveillance. 7 In Japan, the proportion of those reported to surveillance among people diagnosed with HIV and AIDS was indicated to be sufficiently high. 8 Highly active antiretroviral treatments have been widely used in cases diagnosed with HIV and/or AIDS since 1997.…”
Section: Cumulative Number Of People With Hiv Estimated From Surveillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio has been revised several times, but the most recent studies adopt an estimate of 1/5.1 (reported/unreported), because approximately 19.6% of the AIDS cases reported up until the mid-1990s were previously diagnosed as being infected with HIV [30,32]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since implementation of the Law Concerning the Prevention of Infectious Diseases and Medical Care in 1999, replacing the previous law for HIV/AIDS in Japan, it has become difficult to link individuals initially categorized as (1) and later as (3) due to the altered administrative system [48]. Moreover, the Second Report was often delayed because many physicians did not feel particularly obliged to report AIDS cases that had already been documented as HIV infected [32]. Thus, owing to the suggestion that 'Second Reports are confusing', they became non-obligatory after 1999 and, since then, individuals categorized as such have not been included in the total number of AIDS cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%