Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review

Abstract

Background Guidelines aim to support evidence-informed practice but are inconsistently used without implementation strategies. Our prior scoping review revealed that guideline implementation interventions were not selected and tailored based on processes known to enhance guideline uptake and impact. The purpose of this study was to update the prior scoping review. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published from 2014 to January 2021 that evaluated guideline implementation interventions. We screened studies in triplicate and extracted data in duplicate. We reported study and intervention characteristics and studies that achieved impact with summary statistics. Results We included 118 studies that implemented guidelines on 16 clinical topics. With regard to implementation planning, 21% of studies referred to theories or frameworks, 50% pre-identified implementation barriers, and 36% engaged stakeholders in selecting or tailoring interventions. Studies that employed frameworks (n=25) most often used the theoretical domains framework (28%) or social cognitive theory (28%). Those that pre-identified barriers (n=59) most often consulted literature (60%). Those that engaged stakeholders (n=42) most often consulted healthcare professionals (79%). Common interventions included educating professionals about guidelines (44%) and information systems/technology (41%). Most studies employed multi-faceted interventions (75%). A total of 97 (82%) studies achieved impact (improvements in one or more reported outcomes) including 10 (40% of 25) studies that employed frameworks, 28 (47.45% of 59) studies that pre-identified barriers, 22 (52.38% of 42) studies that engaged stakeholders, and 21 (70% of 30) studies that employed single interventions. Conclusions Compared to our prior review, this review found that more studies used processes to select and tailor interventions, and a wider array of types of interventions across the Mazza taxonomy. Given that most studies achieved impact, this might reinforce the need for implementation planning. However, even studies that did not plan implementation achieved impact. Similarly, even single interventions achieved impact. Thus, a future systematic review based on this data is warranted to establish if the use of frameworks, barrier identification, stakeholder engagement, and multi-faceted interventions are associated with impact. Trial registration The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/4nxpr) and published in JBI Evidence Synthesis.

Applying a knowledge translation framework for triaging low back pain and radicular pain at an emergency department: an iterative process within an uncontrolled before-and-after design

“…This illustrates that it is important to include all stakeholders in such a change process. A recent literature review also showed that stakeholder engagement is increasingly used in guideline implementation 50. After implementation of the protocol we never observed a drop in LBP patients coming to the ED.…”

“…A recent literature review also showed that stakeholder engagement is increasingly used in guideline implementation. 50 After implementation of the protocol we never observed a drop in LBP patients coming to the ED. A more difficult barrier to tackle was the high turnover of trainees rotating at the ED and involved in managing the target patient population.…”

Adapting Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Blood Pressure Management and Kidney Replacement Therapy in Adults and Children in the Saudi Arabian context using the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT methodology

“…Moreover, Implementation tools will include customized computerized provider order entry (CPOE) with order sets integrated into electronic health record systems at selected pilot sites throughout Saudi Arabia. Local guideline implementation strategies/interventions may also include: leadership commitment and engagement, dissemination and communication, regular training and education, regular audit and feedback to identify facilitators and barriers, and patients as change champions [71][72][73][74].…”

Barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies for guideline-adherence in physiotherapy: a scoping review protocol

“…Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements to assist healthcare professionals in evidence-informed decision making 1. They include recommendations based on the best available evidence and aim to reduce practice variations in planning and delivering healthcare interventions 2. Clinicians are therefore encouraged to use guidelines to improve patient health outcomes, the quality of clinical decisions, and the safety and cost-effectiveness of care 3.…”