2015
DOI: 10.5120/20559-2947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Extractive and Abstractive Techniques in Text Summarization

Abstract: Text Summarization was proved to be an advantage over manually summarizing the large data. It condenses the salient features from the text by preserving the content and serves the meaningful summary. Classification can be done in two ways -extractive and abstractive summarization. Extractive summarization uses statistical and linguistic features to determine the important features and fuse them into a shorter version. Whereas abstractive summarization understands the whole document and then generates the summa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SimpleNLG is an example of such a system, which provides interfaces for direct control over the way phrases are created and merged and inflectional and morphological control. [250], [251] are examples of multimodal semantic methods utilized in text summarization.…”
Section: ) Multimodal Semantic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SimpleNLG is an example of such a system, which provides interfaces for direct control over the way phrases are created and merged and inflectional and morphological control. [250], [251] are examples of multimodal semantic methods utilized in text summarization.…”
Section: ) Multimodal Semantic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the task has been boosted by the development of deep learning algorithms and the explosive growth of data [3], especially for abstractive summarization. Large-scale high quality document-summary pairs are a precondition of high quality Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (2003) argue that a term which occurs more frequently is not necessarily a good discriminator, and should be given less weight than one which occurs less frequently. In order to overcome this problem, PCA has been extensively used in summarization tasks whereby a summary is generated by extracting sentences that are likely to represent the main theme of a document (Bhatia & Jaiswal, 2015;Canhasi & Kononenko;Kogilavani, 2016). This is one of the basic geometric tools that are used to produce a lower number of the vectors within a corpus (Härdle & Simar, 2003;Jackson, 1991).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%