2015
DOI: 10.17987/icfj.v1i3.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in coronary heart disease mortality and statin utilization in two European areas with different population risk levels: Stockholm and Sicily

Abstract: Background and Aim: The reduction in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in Europe has been associated with a<br />reduction in coronary risk factors, including dyslipidaemia. Statins reduce blood cholesterol levels and the risk of coronary<br />events. Their utilization has substantially increased over the years. Although statins should be prescribed according to clinical<br />guidelines, doctors’ decisions about treatment are usually made subjectively and are influenced by the population… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently observed that statin utilisation is higher in Stockholm, Sweden, which is a relatively high-risk area, compared to Sicily, Italy, with a lower population risk level. 32 However, the analysis of the time trend of changes in statin utilisation and CHD mortality rates in these regions between 2000 and 2011 showed that statin utilisation increased more rapidly in Sicily, where the reduction in CHD mortality was slower, whereas a smaller increase occurred in Stockholm, with a larger reduction in CHD mortality. Such discordance between time trends may indicate that the doctors' attitude to initiating statin treatment is influenced by factors not directly related to the actual patient risk, such as the doctors' gender and length of clinical experience, patients' attitudes to medicines, drug reimbursement policies, prescribing restrictions and marketing by pharmaceutical companies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We recently observed that statin utilisation is higher in Stockholm, Sweden, which is a relatively high-risk area, compared to Sicily, Italy, with a lower population risk level. 32 However, the analysis of the time trend of changes in statin utilisation and CHD mortality rates in these regions between 2000 and 2011 showed that statin utilisation increased more rapidly in Sicily, where the reduction in CHD mortality was slower, whereas a smaller increase occurred in Stockholm, with a larger reduction in CHD mortality. Such discordance between time trends may indicate that the doctors' attitude to initiating statin treatment is influenced by factors not directly related to the actual patient risk, such as the doctors' gender and length of clinical experience, patients' attitudes to medicines, drug reimbursement policies, prescribing restrictions and marketing by pharmaceutical companies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5,6,7 Moreover, it varies widely among different populations, possibly due to physician preferences, cultural differences, socioeconomic factors, adherence to treatment, drug cost, and population CHD risk profiles. 8 While the reasons for not prescribing statin were not available to us, the study highlights an important discrepancy between guidelines for optimal lipid lowering therapy and current practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although the patterns were broadly similar there were some important differences between countries. For instance Tunisia had a much higher uptake of statins for primary prevention, but in other populations these uptakes remained low at the end of our period of analysis (approximately 2008), suggesting significantly greater potential with increasing use in the future 42 . Simple, accepted drug regimens or combinations (generally including aspirin, a calcium channel blocker, ACE inhibitor and statin) may be cost-effective for CHD patients even in low income settings and merit further study 43 44 .…”
Section: Increasing Uptake Of Evidence-based Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 80%