2009
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Child Overweight Rates and Energy Intake in France From 1999 to 2007: Relationships With Socioeconomic Status

Abstract: Our objectives were (i) to assess the current prevalence of childhood overweight (including obesity) (OWOB) in France and its relationship with comprehensive socioeconomic status (SES) indicators and (ii) to examine trends in OWOB prevalence and changes in energy intake (EI) and sedentary behavior (SED) based on the previous INCA 1 (Individuelle Nationale des Consommations Alimentaires) data (1998)(1999). A representative sample of children aged 3-14 (n = 1,030) was taken from the 2006-2007 cross-sectional INC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

16
102
2
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
16
102
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Prevalence data on overweight/obesity based on self-reported data from 11-, 13-and 15-year-olds were available from twenty-nine of the thirty countries Additional reports on the trends in the prevalence of overweight and/or obesity were found for the following countries (Table 2): Cyprus, Greece, Portugal, Spain (Cuenca), Ireland (Co Kildare), UK (West Scotland), the Czech Republic, Poland (Cracow, East rural), Finland, France, the Netherlands (national, the Hague), Norway (Bergen, Trøndelag) and Sweden (national, Stockholm, Gothenburg) (10,16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prevalence data on overweight/obesity based on self-reported data from 11-, 13-and 15-year-olds were available from twenty-nine of the thirty countries Additional reports on the trends in the prevalence of overweight and/or obesity were found for the following countries (Table 2): Cyprus, Greece, Portugal, Spain (Cuenca), Ireland (Co Kildare), UK (West Scotland), the Czech Republic, Poland (Cracow, East rural), Finland, France, the Netherlands (national, the Hague), Norway (Bergen, Trøndelag) and Sweden (national, Stockholm, Gothenburg) (10,16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2500, SR, N m Linearly in all age/gender groups Finland (29) 1979-2005 12-18--IOTF CSS 3 14, n . 2500, SR, N m Across sociodemographic groups France (30) 1998-2007 3-14 IOTF CSS 3 2, n 1000, SR/M, N -No changes The Netherlands (15) 1980 (31) 1999-2007 3-16---IOTF CSS 3 9, n 8000-10 000, Mr, O mk m Especially in the Turkish, Dutch girls k Norway (Bergen) (32) 1971-2006 4-15--Weight/height CSS 3 2, n 1000-5000, M, O m Lower increase in the older ages Norway (Trøndelag) (33) 1966-1997 14-18 BMI CSS 3 2, n . 5000, M, O m Higher in the upper BMI groups Norway (Trøndelag) (34) 1966-1997 14-18 IOTF CSS 3 2, n .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional socio-economic factor, called the 'household living standards index', was used. It was derived from correspondence analysis performed on the matrix based on the variables coding for the household's living standards, as previously described (19) . The score of each household on the first principal component was used as the summary index, and divided into tertiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutritional interventions aimed at reducing energy intake can have a quantitative dimension (reducing the overall amount of foods eaten) or a qualitative dimension (stimulating the intake of products with a more favourable nutrient composition) (3)(4)(5) . Despite these interventions to reduce people's energy intake, overweight and obesity prevalence is not decreasing (6,7) . Although several factors and individual differences contribute to this problem, part of the explanation might be found in the fact that people compensate in response to nutritional interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%