2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Adherence to Thromboprophylaxis Guideline in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent rates of VTE have either been rising or stable in the United States (14–16), China (17,18), Norway (19), Sweden (20), and Alberta (21), a Canadian province with similar population and health care delivery to Manitoba. In 1 urological study, despite guidelines advocating for thromboprophylaxis after radical cystectomy, the use of thromboprophylaxis in that setting was underused, not exceeding 60% of eligible patients (22). In another study of gynecology inpatients, thromboprophylaxis was shown to be decreasing between 2011 and 2017 for hysterectomy procedures (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent rates of VTE have either been rising or stable in the United States (14–16), China (17,18), Norway (19), Sweden (20), and Alberta (21), a Canadian province with similar population and health care delivery to Manitoba. In 1 urological study, despite guidelines advocating for thromboprophylaxis after radical cystectomy, the use of thromboprophylaxis in that setting was underused, not exceeding 60% of eligible patients (22). In another study of gynecology inpatients, thromboprophylaxis was shown to be decreasing between 2011 and 2017 for hysterectomy procedures (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extended postoperative courses of enoxaparin upon hospital discharge have been shown to decrease VTE rates by 7% after RC [12,24]. However, VTE prophylaxis is generally underutilized after RC, with a recent study reporting a maximum of 58.6% of patients in the United States receiving in-hospital pharmacological thromboprophylaxis [25]. Additionally, although the authors found that the use of prophylaxis increased over the years of their study (2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014), the risk of VTE did not change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note the survey was not designed to elucidate perioperative thromboprophylaxis patterns, where treatment gaps are also evident. 35 Likewise, Danish guidelines actually allow for use of primary thromboprophylaxis for selected ambulatory cancer patients, but this survey did not cover this aspect, which recent data suggest is rarely used. 36 …”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%