2020
DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Abstinence and Retention Associated with a Medication-Assisted Treatment Program for People with Opioid Use Disorders

Abstract: Background: Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is an evidence-based program for patients with opioid use disorders. Yet, within the state of Utah, MAT had not been widely available, promoted, or adopted within the public sector. Recognizing the potential benefit, a collective impact approach was used to promote social change and increase the use of MAT in the community for treatment of opioid use disorders.Objective: Conduct a retrospective, observational case series study to measure the effect of a community… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This systematic review found that when compared to the literature on treatment as usual (TAU) MAT, LAIB treatment had comparable rates of employment (44-51%) (Rosic, Worster, Thabane, Marsh, & Samaan, 2020;Zippel-Schultz et al, 2016), retention (50-73%) (O'Connor et al, 2020), and abstinence (35-82%) (Brunisholz et al, 2020;Carew & Comiskey, 2018;Teesson et al, 2008). Specific identified benefits of LAIB compared to TAU MAT were: (1) the reduced risk of intentional or accidental diversion of buprenorphine to others including children in the community; (2) the dosing flexibility with regard to unanticipated treatment interruptions, including incarceration; and (3) reduction in time lost and stigma associated with frequent medication collection.…”
Section: Comparison To Treatment As Usualmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This systematic review found that when compared to the literature on treatment as usual (TAU) MAT, LAIB treatment had comparable rates of employment (44-51%) (Rosic, Worster, Thabane, Marsh, & Samaan, 2020;Zippel-Schultz et al, 2016), retention (50-73%) (O'Connor et al, 2020), and abstinence (35-82%) (Brunisholz et al, 2020;Carew & Comiskey, 2018;Teesson et al, 2008). Specific identified benefits of LAIB compared to TAU MAT were: (1) the reduced risk of intentional or accidental diversion of buprenorphine to others including children in the community; (2) the dosing flexibility with regard to unanticipated treatment interruptions, including incarceration; and (3) reduction in time lost and stigma associated with frequent medication collection.…”
Section: Comparison To Treatment As Usualmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…management. 8,9 Addressing this need involves increasing the capacity of primary care and health care centers to deliver integrated care and includes the need for overdose prevention and harm reduction strategies in the context of telehealth services. Systemwide changes involving the use of teambased brief interventions and collaborative care management models to increase practice integration are needed.…”
Section: Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These outcomes are consistent with or better than outcomes listed in the broad body of research on MAT to date, which typically shows 50% retention in care. [9][10][11] Limited research is focused on the efficacy of low-threshold MAT programs, with few studies describing their features. 3,25 Our findings illustrate the effectiveness of delivering MAT for OUD using a team-based harm reduction approach for patients with complex health care needs through an interprofessional integrated care model.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The collective impact model has shown promise in addressing and preventing drug dependency (Bonfine et al, 2018; Brunisholz et al, 2020; Knighton et al, 2018). Bonefine, et al used sequential intercept mapping (identifying a community’s cross-sector resources and approaches) to encourage treatment adherence and prevent criminal justice involvement, while Brunisholz et al and Knighton et al created a broad coalition whose partnership supported an increase in access to treatment resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%