Trend analysis of sustainability claims: The European fisheries and aquaculture markets case

Lucas, Stérenn; Soler, Louis-Georges; Revoredo‐Giha, Cesar

doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102141

Cited by 11 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fishery governance is a dynamic process, in which the fishing community makes decisions in allocating resources to sustain ecological, income, and social livelihoods [42].  Marketing and Market Potential Fisheries of the future will not only depend on new product innovation, but are also required to carry out promotions to increase their value [43] in accordance with consumer expectations as a potential market [44]. Promotions whose implementation involves the participation of various agencies, have an influence on the sustainability of fisheries resource management.…”

Section: The Impact Forecasting the Development Of Natuna Regency As ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of Natuna Regency as a fishery industrial zone in the Indonesian border area

Pramoda¹,

Shafitri

Apriliani³

et al. 2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of infrastructure development in the marine and fisheries sector is faced with the challenge of realizing the integration between national policies through the potential, problems, or needs in the regions as outlined in society-based plans. The interest of the Indonesian government to develop Natuna Regency as a fishery industrial zone is related to potential resources that can still be optimized and has a strategic water as a border area, making it prone to illegal fishing cases by neighboring countries. Based on that, the purpose of this study is to examine the development of Natuna Regency as a fishery industrial zone. The analysis was carried out qualitatively with a case study approach and discussed descriptively. The parameters used to measure the readiness of Natuna Regency as a fishery industrial zone are: 1) government policy and governance; 2) fish resources utilization and spatial planning; 3) infrastructure; 4) community empowerment and business; 5) institutional; 6) technology. The result showed: 1) aspects of the development pillars that have been assessed as supporting Natuna Regency to become a fishery industrial zone; 2) the impact of fishery industrial development policies can increase economic activity in Natuna Regency; 3) the Natuna’s Regency appointment as a fishery industrial zone by the Indonesian government is the right policy.

show abstract

Section: The Impact Forecasting the Development Of Natuna Regency As ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of Natuna Regency as a fishery industrial zone in the Indonesian border area

Pramoda¹,

Shafitri

Apriliani³

et al. 2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such claims are increasingly addressed in sustainability, food and marketing research (see e.g. Cummins et al, 2014;Alevizou et al, 2015;Gupta and Chauhan, 2021;Lucas et al, 2021;van Doorn et al, 2021). So far, the support for the different sustainability claims made for MUTs, and whether this technology is better than OCE for placement of subsurface infrastructure, have not been systematically examined.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Review of the Sustainability of Multi-Utility Tunnels for Colocation of Subsurface Infrastructure

Bergman

Anderberg

Krook

et al. 2022

Front. Sustain. Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-utility tunnel (MUT) have received increasing attention as an alternative method for installing subsurface infrastructure for the distribution of electricity, telecommunications, water, sewage and district heating. MUTs are described as a potentially more sustainable technology than conventional open-cut excavation (OCE), especially if the entire life cycle of these cable and pipe networks is taken into account. Based on an extensive review of the academic literature, this article aims to identify and critically examine claims made about the pros and cons of using MUT for the placement of subsurface infrastructure. Identified claims are mapped, and their validity and applicability assessed. These claims are then analyzed from a sustainability perspective, based on the three sustainability dimensions and a life cycle perspective. The results show that a variety of advantages and disadvantages of using MUTs for subsurface infrastructure are highlighted by the articles, but several of these are without any empirical support. When some form of empirical support is presented, it usually comes from case-specific analyses of MUTs, and the applicability in other MUT projects is seldom discussed. Economic performance is the sustainability dimension that has received the most attention, while environmental performance has not been analyzed in the reviewed literature, which is a major limitation of the current knowledge. In summary, the knowledge about the sustainability performance of using MUTs for subsurface infrastructure is still limited and incoherent. In order to increase the knowledge, this article points out the importance of new case studies, in which the sustainability consequences of using MUTs for subsurface infrastructure are mapped and evaluated by combining both quantitative and qualitative assessment methods.

show abstract

“…There has been an increasing trend towards using food claims to position products and promote brands in the targeted market, and this is particularly the case with credence attribute claims (e.g. carbon neutrality) over the last 20 years (Lucas et al. , 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of credence attribute claims in food product launch – a comparative study of New Zealand and Australia

Yang

Tantiwat

Renwick

et al. 2022

BFJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper aims to empirically investigate the role of product positioning in the launch of food and drink products using a large dataset of new product development by food companies in Australia (AU) and New Zealand (NZ). As such, positioning through credence attribute claims can be associated with product launch strategies, including brand-new products, expansion of product ranges, new packaging and relaunch, as a response to market demand.Design/methodology/approachText analysis was used to investigate the descriptions of food claims using Structured Query Language, providing a word list of food claims and further filtered and categorised into groups of claims. Multinomial regression models were then employed to analyse the association between product launch strategies and food claims adopted by firms.FindingsThe results of this paper provide evidence that positioning via food claims play an important role in product launch strategies in both AU and NZ. Types of food claims matter differently to firms' product launch decisions in the two markets. The “green” and “ethical” attributes are found to be associated with new launches in NZ but not in AU. Claims that are seen as most important for consumers are more likely to be engendered for the more costly launch approach.Originality/valueThis study is amongst the first studies that addresses the role of positioning in product launch strategies of food companies. The results and findings provide insights into the different prevailing credence attributes from the firm side and help policymakers to regulate the delivery of information about credence attributes to consumers.

show abstract

Trend analysis of sustainability claims: The European fisheries and aquaculture markets case

Cited by 11 publications

References 32 publications

The development of Natuna Regency as a fishery industrial zone in the Indonesian border area

The development of Natuna Regency as a fishery industrial zone in the Indonesian border area

A Critical Review of the Sustainability of Multi-Utility Tunnels for Colocation of Subsurface Infrastructure

The role of credence attribute claims in food product launch – a comparative study of New Zealand and Australia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About