2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trehalose solution viscosity at low temperatures measured by dynamic light scattering method: Trehalose depresses molecular transportation for ice crystal growth

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe inhibitory effects of trehalose on ice crystal growth were discussed on the basis of the viscosity measurements of aqueous solutions via the dynamic light-scattering method. The temperature and concentration conditions of the solution were ranged between 268 and 343 K and up to 50 wt%, respectively, which were feasible for applying this novel technique and were useful in the indirect measurement of the macroscopic dynamic properties of the trehalose solutions. A comparison of the viscosity d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extracted correlation times of s c = 130 ± 10 ps in water-sucrose and 160 ± 10 ps in watertrehalose give a slightly higher microscopic viscosity in trehalose. This is in agreement with the results of numerous studies of water-disaccharide solutions [95][96][97][98]. The difference between s c = 130 ps in the 50 % w/w water-sucrose solution and 1.2 ns in the rehydrated sucrose sample is reasonable considering the fact that the molar ratios of water/disaccharide are about 20 in the solution and 2.5 in the matrix, as determined by FTIR.…”
Section: W-band Epr Of Rehydrated Matricessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The extracted correlation times of s c = 130 ± 10 ps in water-sucrose and 160 ± 10 ps in watertrehalose give a slightly higher microscopic viscosity in trehalose. This is in agreement with the results of numerous studies of water-disaccharide solutions [95][96][97][98]. The difference between s c = 130 ps in the 50 % w/w water-sucrose solution and 1.2 ns in the rehydrated sucrose sample is reasonable considering the fact that the molar ratios of water/disaccharide are about 20 in the solution and 2.5 in the matrix, as determined by FTIR.…”
Section: W-band Epr Of Rehydrated Matricessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example it was reported that 1-10% w/w sucrose or trehalose solutions exhibited very similar rheological properties to those of pure water. 25 However, direct evidence on the differential hydrogen bonding of the evaluated cryoprotectant with Cit-GNPs is required to fully explain their differential cryoprotective ability and should be the subject of a subsequent study. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 To follow the aggregation of GNPs quantitatively, two methods were employed: dynamic light scattering (DLS) and plasmon band broadening.…”
Section: Stability Of Citmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-planar growth of the ice interface was expected because of the high interface speed recorded (Figure 2C), the large thermal gradient imposed (Figure 2B), and the high viscosity of the solution (e.g. supercooled 30 wt% trehalose solution has ten times the viscosity of water at −20°C (Uchida et al, 2009)). Note that the speed of ice growth was faster in lower concentration solutions (Figure 2C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%