2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
63
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest products act as substitutes for politically, socially and environmentally insecure fossil fuels. In the climate change context, agricultural greenhouse gas sinks may be instrumental in removing carbon from the atmosphere by changing the vegetation cover and improving management, switching from the conventional agricultural crops to forests [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest products act as substitutes for politically, socially and environmentally insecure fossil fuels. In the climate change context, agricultural greenhouse gas sinks may be instrumental in removing carbon from the atmosphere by changing the vegetation cover and improving management, switching from the conventional agricultural crops to forests [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ethanol production through conversion of biomass becomes commercially viable in the future, growing short rotation woody crops (SRWC) for substituting fossil fuels may become a cost-effective strategy to combat climate change [36]. Another advantage of carbon sequestered through afforestation projects may help earn carbon credits to meet carbon reduction targets as outlined in Kyoto protocol.…”
Section: Carbon Sequestration and Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second possible sequestration benefit uses forest fibre (bioenergy wood) as a substitute for fossil fuels. Carbon is offset by preventing emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels that would otherwise have been used (Baral and Guha 2004). This prevention requires the specific use of harvested fibre to displace carbon emissions from fossil fuels.…”
Section: Carbon Sequestration and Offset Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prevention requires the specific use of harvested fibre to displace carbon emissions from fossil fuels. Usually, these two scenarios have been considered as alternative strategies (Baral and Guha 2004), mostly due to different timings of CO 2 emissions. However, when occurring at the same location, they can be combined under two conditions: (1) woody biomass is used solely for energy production, and (2) IPCC rules (IPCC 2003) are used to track carbon emissions in harvested forest products to avoid double counting.…”
Section: Carbon Sequestration and Offset Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%